Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Every word is a world”

Loanword ideologies and linguistic purism in post-Soviet Armenia

Bibliographic Data

ID11293239
AuthorsEmma Portugal (0000-0002-3491-8245, University of Michigan, corresponding author), Sean Nonnenmacher (0000-0002-5246-200X, University of Pittsburgh)
Year2024
Volume43
Issue3
Pages331-364
Publication date2024-05-27
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueMultilingua (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0167-8507 • E-ISSN: 1613-3684
PublisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/multi-2022-0152
OpenAlexW4390424905
LanguageEN
Citations received2

Through the analysis of materials such as online articles, blogs, and radio broadcasts, this paper investigates linguistic purism toward Russian and English loanwords in the understudied context of post-Soviet Armenia. Our analysis finds that public commentators categorize potential loanwords as “borrowings” (փոխառություն [phokhaṛuthyun]) if acceptable and “foreignisms” (օտարաբանություն [ōtarabanuthyun]) if unacceptable, while also comparing these loanwords with acceptable and unacceptable Armenian equivalent words. In categorizing both loanwords and Armenian equivalents, commentators base their arguments on evaluative contrasts related to threats to the language, the desirability of word meaning and usage, and stylistic appropriateness. Though commentators situate themselves into opposing purist and moderate camps, differentiated by their tolerance of loanwords and classifications of individual words, the two camps rely on the same ideological framework of contrasts and use similar argumentation. Thus, while the debate invokes binary criteria for evaluating words, similar to those identified in other instances of linguistic purism, Armenian commentators themselves often defy binary categorization, falling along a fluid language-ideological continuum in which seemingly opposing commentators sometimes demonstrate striking similarities. Framed alongside prior studies of language ideologies in post-Soviet spaces, this evidence suggests that the loanword debate has a more symbolic than practical function in Armenia’s contemporary multilingual society

Argumentation theory · Armenian · Categorization · Context (archaeology · Epistemology · Ideology · Linguistics · Loanword · Meaning (existential · Political science · Politics · Sociology · History · Law · Linguistic research and analysis · Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity · Multilingual Education and Policy · Philosophy

  • Dialect vowel maintenance in a diglossic context

    Open Access•Emma Portugal•Folia Linguistica•2026

  • Moral foundations and language ideologies

    Hasan Berkcan Şimşek•Multilingua•2026

Unique citing works2
Citations per year2
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae