Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Mentoring interpreters of new and emerging languages for Australian courts and tribunals

Bibliographic Data

ID11293681
AuthorsMiranda Lai (0000-0002-2038-1547, 5376 RMIT University , Melbourne , Australia, corresponding author), Erika Gonzalez (0009-0000-5264-659X, 5376 RMIT University , Melbourne , Australia)
Year2025
Volume44
Issue3
Pages315-346
Publication date2025-05-26
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMultilingua (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0167-8507 • E-ISSN: 1613-3684
PublisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/multi-2024-0062
OpenAlexW4407459031
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited29

Quality interpreting in courts and tribunals requires high competence in language and contextual knowledge, as well as interactional management and ethical reasoning skills. But a cohort of the interpreting workforce in Australia – particularly those from the so-called “new and emerging” language backgrounds – has been disadvantaged due to a lack of access to university or vocational training for interpreters. These interpreters, therefore, work in specialised areas such as courts and tribunals with little or no formal training. This paper describes a pilot project that operationalised Optimal Standard 3 of Australia’s Recommended National Standards for Working with Interpreters in Courts and Tribunals regarding the provision of mentorship to interpreters who are under- or untrained. The project comprised two stages: in Stage 1, interpreters attended a tailored professional development course on legal interpreting; then in Stage 2, a group of thirteen interpreters selected from Stage 1, plus four recruited mentors, participated in mentorship reflecting Optimal Standard 3. The outcomes show the potential applicability and utility of this Standard for its intended purpose. However, for such initiatives to be viable, they require additional support, including administrative and financial resources from the courts and other stakeholders, as well as a rethinking of interpreter employment models

Interpreter · Linguistics · Political science · Programming language · Computer Science · Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare · Military, Security, and Education Studies · Philosophy

  • The right to be seen, heard, and understood

    Open Access•Ran Yi•Australian Journal of Linguistics•2026

  • The Discourse of Court Interpreting

    Sandra Hale, Sandra Beatriz Hale•The discourse of court interpreting•2004

  • Formal and Informal Mentorships

    Open Access•Georgia T Chao, PATM WALZ et al.•Personnel Psychology•1992

  • Judicial reliance on the executive

    Ben Grimes•Griffith Law Review•2021

  • Second‐hand Emotion? Exploring the Contagion and Impact of Trauma and Distress in the Asylum Law Context

    Open Access•Helen Baillot, Sharon Cowan et al.•Journal of Law and Society•2013

  • Mentoring programs

    Open Access•Michael J Karcher, Gabriel P Kuperminc et al.•Journal of Community Psychology•2006

  • Using thematic analysis in psychology

    Open Access•Braun, Virginia Braun et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2006

  • Professional Interpreters and Vicarious Trauma

    Open Access•Miranda Lai, Susie Costello•Qualitative Health Research•2021

  • Situated Learning

    Open Access•Jean Lave, Etienne Wenger•Situated Learning•1991

  • A Step-by-Step Process of Thematic Analysis to Develop a Conceptual Model in Qualitative Research

    Open Access•Muhammad Naeem, Wilson Ozuem et al.•International Journal of…•2023

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae