Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Double Religious Belonging and Some Commonly Held Ideas about Dialogue and Conversion

Bibliographic Data

ID11295493
AuthorsPatrik Fridlund (0000-0003-0067-0584, Lund University, Sweden and Catholic University of ParisFrance, corresponding author)
Year2014
Volume31
Issue2
Pages255-279
Publication date2014-07-14
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMission Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0168-9789 • E-ISSN: 1573-3831
PublisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1163/15733831-12341336
OpenAlexW1974689860
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited14

There is often a perceived tension between dialogue on the one hand and conversion on the other hand. This article suggests that this tension may be related to religious conviction and religious belonging being seen as monolithic. A basic idea of this article is that there are suggestive empirical findings and relevant conceptual arguments about double religious belonging in a large sense, which lead to a profound questioning, which undermines established views of religion as comprehensive systems. This has implications for conceptions of dialogue and conversion. It is suggested that a consequence of taking into consideration double religious belonging in a broad sense is that established ideas of religions as comprehensive interpretative schemes are undermined. Instead, one would have to acknowledge the fragmented, partial, and contextual character of religion. Accordingly, interreligious dialogue and conversion must also be understood as diversified, variegated and fragmented phenomena. Dialogue is addressed to specific issues, in precise contexts, regarding particular concerns, and the same could generally be said of the aim to convert others

Character (mathematics · Conviction · Epistemology · History of religions · Political science · Religious conversion · Sociology · Biblical Studies and Interpretation · Law · Philosophy · Religion and Society Interactions · Religion, Society, and Development · Religious studies

  • Faith-based Diplomacy and Interfaith Dialogue

    Scott Blakemore•Brill Research Perspectives in…•2019

  • Fluidity and flexibility of 'belonging

    Open Access•Tuuli Lähdesmäki, Tuija Saresma et al.•Acta Sociologica•2016

  • Beyond Conversational Dialogue

    Open Access•Ilesanmi G Ajibola, Ilesanmi Ajibola•Religions•2024

  • Three rival versions of moral enquiry

    Alasdair C Macintyre•Three rival versions of moral…•1990

  • Constructing local theologies

    Robert J Schreiter•Constructing local theologies•1985

  • The Church in a Postliberal Age

    Open Access•George Lindbeck•Pro Ecclesia A Journal of…•2004

  • Incommensurability, Intratextuality, and Fideism

    Open Access•Terrence W Tilley•Modern Theology•1989

  • Theological Incorrectness

    D Jason Slone•Theological Incorrectness•2004

  • The Construction of Orthodoxy and Heresy

    John Brooks Henderson•The Construction of Orthodoxy and…•1998

  • Lived Religion

    Open Access•Meredith B Mcguire•Lived Religion•2008

  • Religious Pluralism and Christian Truth

    David R Loy, David Loy et al.•Buddhist-Christian Studies•1998

  • Dissonant Voices

    Sharon Peebles Burch, Harold A Netland•Buddhist-Christian Studies•1994

  • An Apology for Apologetics

    Paul Varo Martinson, Paul J Griffiths•Buddhist-Christian Studies•1994

  • Buddhist and Christian? An Exploration of Dual Belonging

    Wendy Dossett•Journal of Contemporary Religion•2012

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0.3
Citation span2016 - 2024 (9)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae