Innovationsschübe durch Außenseiter
Das Beispiel des Amateur‐Astronomen William Herschel
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11307192 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Fritz Krafft (Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1986 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 201-225 |
| Publication date | 1986-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0170-6233 • E-ISSN: 1522-2365 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/bewi.19860090402 |
| OpenAlex | W2121224299 |
| Language | DE |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 27 |
Innovatory advances by outsiders: The example of the amateur astronomer William Herschel. — Every scientific experience and perception has been gained from within a particular historical situation constituted by numerous components, both internal and external to a particular science, called praesentabilia ( Präsentabilien ). They enable and determine the scope and the experiental pale of any given science as well as its way and method of acquiring experience and knowledge. The interaction of such praesentabilia forms, what may be called the Historische Erfahrungsraum (‘historical field of experience’), which each individual and/or (greater/smaller) group shares in respectively. A scientific (cultural, religious, social, disciplinal, etc.) community may be said to exist whereever the intersection of the various sets of praesentabilia making up its members' fields of experience comprises a minimum standard of praesentabilia that form this community, thus establishing its particular Historische(n) Erfahrungsraum. As long and as far someone outside the disciplinal community could acquaint himself with its praesentabilia in a selftaught manner, there will be outsiders and amateurs, who, while lacking any regular (and one‐sided) education and training, yet owning some extra praesentabilia , would be in a position to bring in novel methods of thinking and unconventional perceptions. There may be several reasons for this: (1) because they study fields that are not yet or no longer present in the disciplinal community, or (2) because they are not bound to the usual (uniform and standardized) instrumentation, or (3) because their social status does not seem from the professional scientific community (nor from the socio‐political community, conditional to the former's existence). Conversely they feel not being bound by the rules, the expectations and the aims posited by that scientific community. Since the disciplinal community lacks the praesentabilia that are prerequisite to fully understanding the outsider and amateur, he, in turn, has to overcome much more difficulties, till his innovatory perceptions are acknowledged. On the other hand, whenever his new methods, instruments or points of view prove to be helpful in solving an old problem of the disciplinal community, this solution will generally soon be acknowledged, in case its reproduction is sufficiently guaranteed by the traditional methods and by the usual instruments. Eventually the acknowledgement may lead to the approbation and the acceptance of the said methods, instruments and points of view, because the solution offered has by then become a praesentabile integral to the disciplinal community. The life and career of an outsider and amateur, like William Herschel, is a good instance of a whole range of potentialities of such innovatory advances. Considering these points, the paper deals with several aspects of Herschel's work: his new method of reviewing the heavens ( Himmelsdurchmusterung ) linked to his novel telescopes, — his discovery of the planet Uranus, — his discovery and verification of the existence of physical double stars, — his assumption of historicity and development of cosmic objects, — his determining the shape of the Milky Way by means of a primary method of stellar statistics, ‐ his discovery and determination of the sun's peculiar motion, ‐ and his discovery of the infra‐red radiant heat continuing the spectrum of the visible light
Amateur · Art history · Astronomer · Epistemology · Field (mathematics · Political science · Sociology · German Literature and Culture Studies · German Social Sciences and History · History · History of Science and Natural History · Law · Mathematics · Philosophy
Ferdinand von Richthofen als Erforscher Chinas. Ein Beitrag zur Entstehung und Verarbeitung von Reisebeobachtungen im Zeitalter des Imperialismus
Wissenschaft und Bildung Aspekte zum Verhältnis der beiden Wissensformen in historischen Erfahrungsräumen
Erfahrung und Vorurteil im naturwissenschaftlichen Denken Johannes Keplers
Daß der Liebhaber etwas Erfreuliches und Nützliches zu leisten im Stande ist.” Goethe, Soemmerring und das Os intermaxillare beim Menschen
Amateurs and the Rise of Astrophysics 1840–1910
XIII. Investigation of the powers of the prismatic colours to heat and illuminate objects; with remarks, that prove the different refrangibility of radiant heat. To which is added, an inquiry into the method of viewing the sun advantageously, with telescopes of large apertures and high magnifying powers
Dictionary of Scientific Biography
Amateurs and Astrophysics
Das Werden des Kosmos Von der Erfahrung der zeitlichen Dimension astronomischer Objekte im 18. Jahrhundert
Astrophysik contra Astronomie
Romantischer Dilettantismus — Johann Wilhelm Ritter und die Begründung der Elektrochemie
Amateurs and the Rise of Astrophysics 1840–1910
"Hegemony" and the Amateur Tradition in British Science
Bau und Bildung des Weltalls. Kosmologische Vorstellungen in Dokumenten aus zwei Jahrtausenden . Bernhard Sticker
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,13 |
| Citation span | 1986 - 2000 (15) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |