Modellkonstruktion und empirische Uberpriifbarkeit in Marx’ ‚Kapital‘
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11308170 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ulrich Steinvorth (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1979 |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 164-181 |
| Publication date | 1979-11-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Analyse & Kritik (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0171-5860 • E-ISSN: 2365-9858 |
| Publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1515/auk-1979-0204 |
| OpenAlex | W2397442594 |
| Language | DE |
One of the first objections raised against Marx’ Kapital was that it was an idealistic construction a priori of capitalist economy. Since Marx agreed that his book could seem to be so, we may assume that the analyses of Kapital are not only empirical. I try to show that (1) the analyses of the first chapters of Kapital give a conceptual construction of a model of commodity exchange made up both of generally recognized and of new definitions of commodity exchange, (2) that the model cannot be used for predicting the end of capitalist economy but that (3) it can be applied to reality because (a) the generally recognized definitions correspond to the ordinary usage of the words, (b) the new definitions are in accordance with true empirical statements about capitalist exchange, (c) the model has allowed true predictions about capitalist economy to be deduced, and (4) that therefore it can be used as a reason for putting an end to capitalist economy
Capitalism · Capitalist economy · Commodity · Economics · Economy · Market economy · Neoclassical economics · Political science · Politics · Economic and Social Issues · Economic Theory and Policy · Law · Political Economy and Marxism
| Highly cited | No |
|---|