Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Recht, Strafrecht und Sozialmoral

Bibliographic Data

ID11308207
AuthorsKlaus Luderssen (corresponding author)
Year1981
Volume3
Issue2
Pages194-222
Publication date1981-11-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAnalyse & Kritik (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0171-5860 • E-ISSN: 2365-9858
PublisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/auk-1981-0204
OpenAlexW2399618197
LanguageEN

It is shown by means of four examples that the demarcation between law and morals has become problematical. The study of more recent developments in ethics and in law indicates that in both fields the relevance of discourse and consent has grown. Though both law and morals aim at agreement their degree of dependance on it differs. The definition of law and morals suggested in this article is based on this view. Legitimate law consists of norms, which besides fulfilling other conditions have attained a certain degree of consent. On the other hand one can only talk of social morals when a very high degree of consent has been reached. The consequences of this definition are explained by means of the examples presented at the beginning

Degree (music · Physics · Political science · Relevance (law · Sociology · Criminal Law and Policy · Law · Law and Political Science · Medical and Health Sciences Research · Philosophy

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae