Recht, Strafrecht und Sozialmoral
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11308207 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Klaus Luderssen (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1981 |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 194-222 |
| Publication date | 1981-11-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Analyse & Kritik (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0171-5860 • E-ISSN: 2365-9858 |
| Publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1515/auk-1981-0204 |
| OpenAlex | W2399618197 |
| Language | EN |
It is shown by means of four examples that the demarcation between law and morals has become problematical. The study of more recent developments in ethics and in law indicates that in both fields the relevance of discourse and consent has grown. Though both law and morals aim at agreement their degree of dependance on it differs. The definition of law and morals suggested in this article is based on this view. Legitimate law consists of norms, which besides fulfilling other conditions have attained a certain degree of consent. On the other hand one can only talk of social morals when a very high degree of consent has been reached. The consequences of this definition are explained by means of the examples presented at the beginning
Degree (music · Physics · Political science · Relevance (law · Sociology · Criminal Law and Policy · Law · Law and Political Science · Medical and Health Sciences Research · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|