Kann das Grundeinkommen die Arbeitslosigkeit abbauen
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11308367 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ulrich Steinvorth (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2000 |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 257-268 |
| Publication date | 2000-11-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Analyse & Kritik (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0171-5860 • E-ISSN: 2365-9858 |
| Publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1515/auk-2000-0206 |
| OpenAlex | W2396603668 |
| Language | DE |
| Citations received | 3 |
I agree with Van Parijs that a theory of justice must meet the condition of indicating institutions that eliminate compulsory unemployment, but argue that his basic income is another form of unemployment compensation with all the disadvantages such compensations suffer from. In particular, it does not advance real freedom, but is liable to contribute to narrow political ends. I indicate an alternative and explicate, since Van Parijs disregards it, the right to work and its basis in the common property of natural resources. Finally, I compare the two competing conceptions of a good life that underlie his recommendation of a basic income and my rejection of it
Basic income · Compensation (psychology · Economic growth · Economic Justice · Economics · Epistemology · Full employment · Labour economics · Law and economics · Market economy · Neoclassical economics · Political science · Politics · Property (philosophy · Sociology · Unemployment · Economic and Social Issues · Law · Philosophy · Political Economy and Marxism · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Citations per year | 0.12 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2001 - 2020 (20) |
| Highly cited | No |