Binmore’s Egalitarianism
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11308372 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Christoph Schmidt‐petri (0000-0001-7990-1669, corresponding author), Christoph Schmidt-Petri |
| Year | 2006 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 89-94 |
| Publication date | 2006-05-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Analyse & Kritik (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0171-5860 • E-ISSN: 2365-9858 |
| Publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1515/auk-2006-0108 |
| OpenAlex | W2400861499 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
In this short commentary on Ken Binmore’s Natural Justice I primarily examine the relationship between mainstream egalitarian theories and Binmore’s approach. I argue that Binmore uses key concepts in non-standard ways. As a result, he doesn’t engage enough with the views he criticises
Biology · Economic Justice · Economics · Egalitarianism · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Key (lock · Mainstream · Neoclassical economics · Political science · Positive economics · Social science · Sociology · Law · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Ecology
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |