Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Cooptation and Threats as "Divide and Rule" Tactics

Bibliographic Data

ID11325759
AuthorsEdward J Lawler (corresponding author)
Year1983
Volume46
Issue2
Pages89
Publication date1983-06-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocial Psychology Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0190-2725 • E-ISSN: 1939-8999
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.2307/3033845
OpenAlexW2322461407
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited12

This study examined the impact of a leader's cooptation and threat tactics on the mobilization of revolutionary coalitions. The setting for the research was a stratified, three-person group in which a mythical leader established inequitable pay rates and directed a cooptation or threat tactic at one of two subordinates. The results showed that (a) both cooptation and threat tactics created a conflict of interest between the subordinates, (b) cooptation tactics were more effective at preventing revolts than threats, and (c) cooptation tactics made target subordinates less receptive to pressure for a revolt from nontarget subordinates. The results demonstrate the importance of the influence patterns between subordinates, and the interpretation of differences between the tactics stresses the bearing of these tactics on the normative justification for a revolt

Interpretation (philosophy · Normative · Political economy · Political science · Sociology · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology

  • Progress in Small Group Research

    Jerrold M Levine, Richard L Moreland•Annual Review of Psychology•1990

  • Bama’s Vanmam

    Open Access•Jenitha Blessy, V Bhuvaneswari•Contemporary Voice of Dalit•2023

  • A Decade of Organizational Communication Research

    Myria Watkins Allen, J Micheal Gotcher et al.•Annals of the International…•1993

  • Silencing objections

    Ronald L Cohen, Ronald Cohen•Journal of Human Rights•2002

  • Procedural Justice and Participation

    Open Access•Ronald L Cohen, Ronald Cohen•Human Relations•1985

  • Interaction process analysis

    Robert Freed Bales•Interaction process analysis•1976

  • Tva and the Grass Roots

    Philip Selznick•Tva and the Grass Roots•1984

  • Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society, by Ralf Dahrendorf

    Open Access•Renate Mayntz•Political Science Quarterly•1960

  • The Rebellious Century

    Charles Tilly, Louise A Tilly et al.•Rebellious Century•1975

  • Status Generalization

    Murray Webster, James E Driskell•American Sociological Review•1978

  • Leadership and Crises

    Robert L Hamblin•Sociometry•1958

  • Perceived support and upward mobility as determinants of revolutionary coalitional behavior

    Open Access•H Andrew Michener, Morgan Lyons•Journal of Experimental Social…•1972

  • Some determinants of the intensity of social protest

    Open Access•M G Ro, Michael Ross et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•1971

  • The Sociology of Georg Simmel

    George Simmel, Kurt H Wolff•The Sociology of Georg Simmel•1964

  • Social Status in Jury Deliberations

    Fred L Strodtbeck, Rita M James et al.•American Sociological Review•1957

  • The Norm of Reciprocity

    Alvin W Gouldner•American Sociological Review•1960

  • Status Organizing Processes

    Joseph R Berger, Joseph Berger et al.•Annual Review of Sociology•1980

Citations per year0.12
Citation span1985 - 2023 (39)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae