Post-battle skirmish in the risk assessment wars
Rebuttal to the response of Baumann and colleagues to criticism of their paper, “Evaluating the effectiveness of actuarial risk assessment models”
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11333316 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Will Johnson (Alameda County Public Health Department, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2006 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 9 |
| Pages | 1124-1132 |
| Publication date | 2006-09-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Children and Youth Services Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0190-7409 • E-ISSN: 1873-7765 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.childyouth.2006.04.002 |
| OpenAlex | W1976227427 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 6 |
Actuarial science · Battle · Criticism · Economics · Management · Political science · Rebuttal · Risk assessment · Health and Conflict Studies · History · Law · Medicine
Clinical Versus Actuarial Judgment
Evaluating the effectiveness of actuarial risk assessment models
The risk assessment wars
Remarks concerning the importance of evaluating actuarial risk assessment models
Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures
| Citations per year | 0.18 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2009 - 2020 (12) |
| Highly cited | No |