Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The descent of the doves

Camus’s Fall, Derrida’s ethics

Bibliographic Data

ID11340262
AuthorsMatthew Sharpe, Matt Sharpe (0000-0002-8165-5775, The University of Melbourne, corresponding author)
Year2002
Volume28
Issue2
Pages173-189
Publication date2002-03-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePhilosophy & Social Criticism (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0191-4537 • E-ISSN: 1461-734X
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0191453702028002801
OpenAlexW1968875706
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited2

This essay is a critique of Derrida’s ethical works, using Camus’s last novella The Fall as a critical sounding board. It argues that a danger pertains to any such highly self-reflexive position as Derrida’s: a danger that Camus identified in The Fall, and staged in his character, Jean-Baptiste Clamence. Clamence is a successful Parisian lawyer, on top of his personal and professional life, whose equanimity is troubled after he is the unwitting passer-by as a young woman suicides one night on the Seine. After this time, he comes to consider all his former virtues as concealed vices. He also becomes acutely aware of what he terms the ‘duplicity’ of human beings as such. In Part I, I consider how Clamence’s fall from innocence can be read ‘with’ Derrida’s deconstructive registration of a ‘double bind’ pertaining to our standing vis-à-vis what he terms ‘logocentrism’. I argue that Derrida’s is a post-lapsarian philosophy, which challenges all attempts to construct closed conceptual systems that would confer an epistemic and/or moral certitude upon their expositors. In Part II, I then enter into a more detailed exposition of Derrida’s ‘later’ works broaching friendship, the invitation, the gift, and other ‘matters moral’. I read these texts in the light of an examination of what is involved, for Camus, in being a ‘judge-penitent’ (what Clamence in The Fall calls his profession). I suggest that Derrida runs the risk of a certain ‘puritanism of difference’ in his moral reflections, which defend the aporetic formulation: ‘ tout autre est tout autre’ [every other is every bit other] ( The Gift of Death). The problem is that, while Derrida’s position allows one (everywhere) to say what one is against, it problematizes any affirmative moral stance. Like Clamence, who assumes the right to judge everyone else because he has subjected himself to a severe penitence, I suggest that we have a right to wonder whether Derrida’s deconstructive critique of metaphysics can validate only endless repetitions of itself

Art · Character (mathematics · Epistemology · Fall of man · Friendship · Innocence · Literature · Novella · Politics · Psychoanalysis · Sociology · Digital Media and Philosophy · Law · Philosophy · Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism · Political Theology and Sovereignty · Psychology

  • Fear and Violence as Organizational Strategies

    Open Access•Srinath Jagannathan, Rajnish Rai et al.•Journal of Business Ethics•2022

  • Townships, Brigands and a Shared Religion

    Stephen R L Clark, Stephen RL Clark•Griffith Law Review•2012

  • Understanding PsychoanalysisMatthew Sharpe and Joanne Faulkner Stocksfield, UK

    Open Access•Cameron Ellis, Cameron A J Ellis•Dialogue•2009

  • The Prayers and Tears of Jacques Derrida

    John D Caputo•Prayers and Tears of Jacques…•1997

Citations per year0.18
Citation span2009 - 2022 (14)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae