Made for each other
The interdependence of deconstruction and philosophical hermeneutics
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11340705 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Stephen M Feldman (University of Tulsa, College of Law, Tulsa, OK, USA, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2000 |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 51-70 |
| Publication date | 2000-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Philosophy & Social Criticism (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0191-4537 • E-ISSN: 1461-734X |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/019145370002600103 |
| OpenAlex | W2038622028 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
Critics of Hans-Georg Gadamer maintain that his philosophical hermeneutics is unduly conservative: supposedly, Gadamer too readily accepts tradition and too quickly assumes that a text has a unified and understandable meaning. Critics of Jacques Derrida, meanwhile, declare that deconstruction leads to nihilism: if the meaning of every text is undecidable, then a text can mean anything at all - no one meaning is better or worse than any other. And if there is no ground to stand upon, these critics add, then how can we normatively evaluate others (or ourselves)? In this essay, I respond to the critics of both Gadamer and Derrida by arguing that philosophical hermeneutics and deconstruction should be understood as complementary postmodern philosophies, as mutually supportive descriptions of the hermeneutic situation. As such, deconstruction counters the charge that philosophical hermeneutics is conservative: instead, a Derridean view uncovers the radical political potential that resides within Gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics. Meanwhile, philosophical hermeneutics counters the charge that deconstruction is nihilistic and cannot support ethical or political critique. A Gadamerian view explains how deconstruction assumes the possibility of understanding meaning and maintaining values that can engender critique
Deconstruction (building · Epistemology · Hermeneutics · Interpretation (philosophy · Meaning (existential · Nihilism · Politics · Postmodernism · SOCRATES · Verstehen · Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity · Law · Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy · Philosophy · Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
The Rule of Law or the Rule of Politics? Harmonizing the Internal and External Views of Supreme Court Decision Making
Positioning Rationality and Emotion
Postmodernism's Pit Stops en Route to Utopia
The Rule of Law or the Rule of Politics? Harmonizing the Internal and External Views of Supreme Court Decision Making
The Problem of Critique
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,24 |
| Citation span | 2005 - 2015 (11) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |