Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

What Incentive Structures Do to Political Philosophy

Epistemic Pathologies and Institutional Design

Bibliographic Data

ID11340967
AuthorsSimon Stevens (0000-0002-8570-9072, De Montfort University, corresponding author)
Year2026
Publication date2026-03-25
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePhilosophy & Social Criticism (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0191-4537 • E-ISSN: 1461-734X
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/01914537261438156
OpenAlexW7140281554
LanguageEN
References cited28

Political philosophers increasingly work within institutional environments shaped by metrified evaluation, hypercompetition, and publish-or-perish expectations. This article does not argue that political philosophy has empirically declined or become uniformly conservative. On the contrary, contemporary political theory shows significant pluralisation, including greater visibility for feminist, decolonial, ethnographic, and public-facing approaches. The central claim is instead that prevailing incentive structures generate predictable epistemic pathologies. By systematically rewarding work that is strategically legible, rapidly publishable, and easily refereed, they discourage slower, riskier, and more conceptually ambitious inquiry – especially among early-career scholars whose professional survival depends on repeated publication in a narrow set of high-status venues. Drawing on analyses of perverse incentives in the sciences, the article shows how analogous dynamics operate within political philosophy. It concludes by arguing that reforms to hiring, publishing, and evaluation practices could better align professional incentives with the epistemic goods political philosophy has reason to value

Incentive · Political philosophy · Politics · Set (abstract data type · Visibility · Work (physics · Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Political Science Research and Education

  • Academic Research in the 21st Century

    Open Access•MARC EDWARDS, Marc A Edwards et al.•Environmental Engineering Science•2017

  • The natural selection of bad science

    Open Access•P E Smaldino, Richard Mcelreath•Royal Society Open Science•2016

  • Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications

    Open Access•Ferric C Fang, R Grant Steen et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2012

  • A Defense of Minimalist Liberalism

    Richard Rorty•Debating democracy's discontent•1998

  • Philosophy as Cultural Politics

    Open Access•Richard Rorty•Philosophy As Cultural Politics :…•2007

  • The Reality of the ‘Publish or Perish’ Concept, Perspectives from the Global South

    Open Access•Tibelius Amutuhaire•Publishing Research Quarterly•2022

  • Academic anomie

    Open Access•Richard Watermeyer, Roxana Bolden et al.•Higher Education•2025

  • What Are Data Good for Anyway

    Nahshon Pérez•Social Theory and Practice•2020

  • Normative behaviourism as a solution to four problems in realism and non-ideal theory

    Jonathan Floyd•Critical Review of International…•2018

  • Political philosophy and the nature of expertise

    Ramdas Lamb•Critical Review of International…•2018

  • Should we be writing at a time like this? Reflections on abolition, political science, and international relations

    Open Access•Rhys Crilley•The British Journal of Politics…•2024

  • What’s that smell? Bullshit jobs in higher education

    Open Access•Michael Delucchi, Richard B Dadzie et al.•Review of Social Economy•2024

  • Public political philosophy in Poland

    Open Access•Jonathan Floyd•Ethnicities•2025

  • Ella Baker and the challenge of black rule

    Open Access•Lester K Spence•Contemporary Political Theory•2020

  • The relationship between political philosophy and political science

    Keith Dowding•Australian Journal of Political…•2020

  • Fieldwork in Political Theory

    Open Access•Lisa M Herzog, Lisa Herzog et al.•British Journal of Political…•2017

  • Dilemmas in a general theory of planning

    Open Access•Horst W J Rittel, Melvin M Webber•Policy Sciences•1973

  • Neoliberalism and Geography

    Open Access•Simon Springer•Geography Compass•2010

  • Political Theory in an Ethnographic Key

    Open Access•M Longo, Bernardo Zacka•American Political Science Review•2019

  • The View from Below

    Open Access•Mick Mckeown, Maeve Mckeown•Society•2022

  • Political Philosophy's Methodological Moment and the Rise of Public Political Philosophy

    Open Access•Jonathan Floyd•Society•2022

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae