Challenging Habermas' response to the European Union democratic deficit
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11342115 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jonathan M Bowman (0000-0001-6597-3856, Saint Louis University, corresponding author), Jonathan Bowman (0000-0002-8661-1683, St Louis University, St Louis, MO, USA) |
| Year | 2007 |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 736-755 |
| Publication date | 2007-09-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Philosophy & Social Criticism (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0191-4537 • E-ISSN: 1461-734X |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0191453707080592 |
| OpenAlex | W2112803728 |
| Language | EN |
Jürgen Habermas' response to the European Union democratic deficit calls for a minimal threshold of democratic legislation through an explicit constitutional founding. He defends a model of freedom as autonomous self-determination by proposing to tie basic rights in the EU to a univocal form of European-wide popular sovereignty. Instead of constructing a common European political identity, I appeal to the novel democratic potential of institutions in the EU such as the Open Method of Coordination for mediating overlapping sovereignties in accord with freedom as non-domination. The concluding example of basic rights to effective participation for immigrants and permanent minorities illustrates the strengths of Iris Young's and James Bohman's republican views of non-domination over Habermas' call for a European-wide collective willing
Appeal · Democracy · democratic deficit · Economics · European union · Identity (music · Law and economics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Popular sovereignty · Sociology · Sovereignty · Critical Theory and Philosophy · Law · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Populism, Right-Wing Movements
| Highly cited | No |
|---|