Gilles Deleuze and Jacques Rancière on the Limits of Representation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11342124 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Keren Shahar (0009-0003-5537-275X, Humboldt University of Berlin, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-03-25 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Philosophy & Social Criticism (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0191-4537 • E-ISSN: 1461-734X |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/01914537261434915 |
| OpenAlex | W7140537109 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 10 |
For Gilles Deleuze and Jacques Rancière, representation is a crucial intersection between aesthetic and political concerns. Examining this nexus reveals the conditions necessary for minorities to gain visibility and voice in the collective public sphere. The ongoing crisis of democracy today raises fundamental questions about the relationship between democracy and representation: Is democracy a system in which all voices are accounted for? Does the election of autocratic leaders indicate an anti-democratic shift, or does it, in fact, express a radical dissensus that is intrinsic to democracy itself? Juxtaposing the perspectives of Deleuze and Rancière, I offer a critical examination of the limits of representation – not merely as a procedural mechanism of exclusion and inclusion, but as a philosophical framework with far-reaching political implications
Autocracy · Democracy · Intersection (aeronautics · Nexus (standard · Politics · Representation (politics · Visibility · Critical Theory and Political Philosophy · Digital Media and Philosophy · Marxism and Critical Theory
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |