Influencing Welfare/Warfare Priorities through the New Budgetary Process
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11344357 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ann Blalock (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1977 |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Publication date | 1977-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0191-5096 • E-ISSN: 0191-5096 |
| Publisher | WMU Department of Occupational Therapy (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.15453/0191-5096.3800 |
| OpenAlex | W4378464725 |
| Language | EN |
In the previous article, Weinert challenged social workers, and other professionals in the area of social welfare, to commit themselves to greater collective political action in the interest of substantial social change. He suggested that there are many options for movement in that direction. This article briefly discusses one incremental option within the established political system, intervention within the new Congressional budgetary process. This is not an insignificant strategy. Its purpose is to influence the way the national budget is constructed. The budget incorporates to an important degree the society's prevailing definition of its priorities. Furthermore, future policy alternatives are vitally affected by budget decisions, as mandated budget authority strongly restricts future social policy alternatives
Action (physics · Budget process · Collective action · Commit · Economics · Intervention (counseling · Market economy · Political science · Politics · Process (computing · Public economics · Social policy · Social security · Social Welfare · Welfare · Law · Psychology · Social Policy and Reform Studies
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |