Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

From Natural Law to Natural Rights? Protestant Dissent and Toleration in the Late Eighteenth Century

Bibliographic Data

ID11345370
AuthorsMartin Fitzpatrick (Aberystwyth University, corresponding author), Martin Hugh Fitzpatrick
Year2016
Volume42
Issue2
Pages195-221
Publication date2016-02-17
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueHistory of European Ideas (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0191-6599 • E-ISSN: 1873-541X
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/01916599.2014.934549
OpenAlexW2061177907
LanguageEN
Citations received1

The toleration gained by Protestant Dissenters, the Toleration Act of 1689, was far from comprehensive. It insisted that Dissenting authorities should subscribe to the doctrinal articles of the Church of England. It suspended anti-Dissent legislation rather than repealing it and the sacramental requirement for civil officials remained in place. The situation of Dissent under the law was ambiguous and, at least in theory, the freedom of worship gained under the act was incomplete. This article examines Dissenter attempts to clarify their situation under the law and to be free from the Anglican subscription requirement for minsters, schoolmasters and tutors. It focuses on those aspects of their campaigning propaganda which accorded with natural law theory and particularly on the relationship between concerns for the well-being of the community and the assertion of the natural rights of conscience. It finds that pragmatic considerations competed with theoretical prescriptions. Although the language of natural rights was increasingly to the fore in the late eighteenth century, even the more radical Dissenters did not entirely abandon claims for wider toleration based on natural law considerations. It was not until the mid-nineteenth century that natural rights trumped natural law

Assertion · Conscience · Dissent · Dissenting opinion · Natural (archaeology · Natural law · Political science · Politics · Protestantism · Sociology · Toleration · American Constitutional Law and Politics · History · Law · Reformation and Early Modern Christianity · Religious Freedom and Discrimination

  • Benjamin Hoadly, Samuel Clarke, and the Ethics of the Bangorian Controversy

    Open Access•Dafydd Mills Daniel•Religions•2020

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,17
Citation span2020 - 2020 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae