Criminal Justice Procedures in Family Violence Crimes
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11349371 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Delbert S Elliott (0000-0001-7386-8896, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1989 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Pages | 427-480 |
| Publication date | 1989-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Crime and Justice (BOOK_SERIES) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0192-3234 • E-ISSN: 2153-0416 |
| Publisher | University of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1086/449159 |
| OpenAlex | W2016723231 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 19 |
| References cited | 14 |
Public attitudes about family violence have shifted during the past decade from indifference to support for use of legal remedies to deter and punish. Few studies adequately describe the methods and differential effectiveness of police and prosecutorial handling of family violence cases. Much of the conventional wisdom concerning justice procedures for dealing with family violence is not substantiated by the available research. Only about one-third of domestic disturbance calls to police involves some form of family violence crime; consequently, studies of police responses to domestic disturbance calls are not generalizable to the subset of calls involving family violence. The claim that the police are less likely to apply criminal sanctions to family violence crimes than to stranger violence crimes is not substantiated by existing research. Few studies support the claim that different factors are involved in decisions to prosecute family violence crimes as compared with stranger violence crimes. Finally, no systematic evaluations identify which sentencing outcomes reduce or eliminate subsequent family violence. The existing research should be improved by resolving definitional problems and ambiguities, by collecting data specific to particular types of abuse, by obtaining more representative samples of offenders and victims, by using better controls and longer follow-up periods on study samples, and by adopting more explicit theoretical and conceptual formulations to guide evaluation research
Criminal justice · Criminology · Domestic violence · Economic Justice · Medical emergency · Poison control · Political science · Sanctions · Crime Patterns and Interventions · Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse · Human Factors and Ergonomics · Intimate Partner and Family Violence · Law · Medicine · Psychology · Social Psychology
Domestic Violence Victims' Behavior in Favor of Prosecution
Beyond Mandatory Arrest
Prosecution as a Victim Power Resource
The Impact of Arrest on Domestic Violence
Constraints Against Family Violence
Convicted Survivors
A study of criminal justice discretion
Police Intervention and the Repeat of Domestic Assault
Formal and Informal Deterrents to Domestic Violence
Law's Progressive Potential
Gender, Intimacy, and Lethal Violence
Men who kill their mates
Implications of an Arrest in Domestic Violence Cases
Battered women's shelters and older women
The Incidence and Prevalence of Child Maltreatment
Cessation of Family Violence
The Needs and Rights of Victims of Crime
(Re)Constructing women's resistance to woman abuse
Significations et interprétations de la gravité des événements violents
Patterns in Criminal Homicide
Violence against Wives
The impact of police charges in incidents of wife abuse
Restraining Orders for Battered Women
Family Violence Research Methodology and Design
Further findings on assaultiveness and alcohol use in interpersonal disputes
The Social Organization of Arrest
Intimacy, Violence, and the Police
Killing the Police
Assaultiveness and Alcohol Use in Family Disputes
"Handling" Family Violence
The Prevention of Family Violence
Going for the gold
Bringing the cops back in
| Unique citing works | 19 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,51 |
| Citation span | 1989 - 2009 (21) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 18 |