Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Does the Interest Group Choir Really “Sing with an Upper Class Accent?‘

Coalitions of Race and Gender Groups Before the Supreme Court

Bibliographic Data

ID11367447
AuthorsAshlyn Kuersten (corresponding author), A K Kuersten, Jason Jagemann
Year2000
Volume21
Issue3
Pages53-73
Publication date2000-07-10
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueWomen & Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0195-7732 • E-ISSN: 1540-9473
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1300/j014v21n03_03
OpenAlexW1987105673
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited13

Since Schattschneider (1960), several scholars have argued that the least powerful groups in society will have limited access to the governmental arena; the bias inherent in the system will largely prevent those lacking in power from attaining many of their policy preferences. Yet race and gender-based groups, two of the least powerful groups in society, have been relatively successful in getting some of their demands turned into policy

Choir · Class (philosophy · Economics · Epistemology · Group (periodic table · Interest group · Linguistics · Pedagogy · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Power (physics · Race (biology · Sociology · Stress (linguistics · Gender Politics and Representation · Gender Studies · Law · Philosophy · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Social Policy and Reform Studies

  • Interest Group Participation, Competition, and Conflict in the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Perry Mcd Collins, Paul M Collins et al.•Law & Social Inquiry•2007

  • A Preface to Democratic Theory, Expanded Edition

    Robert A Dahl•Preface to Democratic Theory•2006

  • The Logic of Collective Action

    Mancur Olson•Logic of Collective Action•1965

  • Amici Curiae before the Supreme Court

    Gregory A Caldeira, John Wright et al.•The Journal of Politics•1990

  • Still Muddling, Not Yet Through

    Charles E Lindblom•Public Administration Review•1979

  • The Success of Amici in State Supreme Courts

    Open Access•Donald R Songer, Ashlyn Kuersten•Political Research Quarterly•1995

  • Who Wins on Appeal? Upperdogs and Underdogs in the United States Courts of Appeals

    Donald R Songer, Reginald S Sheehan•American Journal of Political…•1992

  • Interest Groups' Decisions to Join Alliances or Work Alone

    Marie Hojnacki•American Journal of Political…•1997

  • Why the "Haves" Come Out Ahead

    Open Access•M Galanter•Law & Society Review•1974

  • Do The "Haves" Come Out Ahead? Winning and Losing in State Supreme Courts, 1870-1970

    Open Access•Stanton Wheeler, Bliss Cartwright et al.•Law & Society Review•1987

  • Debunking the Myth of Interest Group Invincibility in the Courts

    Open Access•Lee Epstein, C K Rowland•American Political Science Review•1991

  • Representing Women

    Anne N Costain•The Western Political Quarterly•1981

  • Ideology, Status, and The Differential Success of Direct Parties Before the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Reginald S Sheehan, William Mishler et al.•American Political Science Review•1992

Citations per year0.05
Citation span2007 - 2007 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae