Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Justice Sandra Day O'Connor and the Supreme Court's Reaction to Its First Female Member

Bibliographic Data

ID11367646
AuthorsKaren O’connor (0009-0004-0049-7114, Emory and Henry College, corresponding author), Karen O'Connor, Jeffrey A Segal (Stony Brook University)
Year1990
Volume10
Issue2
Pages95-104
Publication date1990-03-21
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueWomen & Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0195-7732 • E-ISSN: 1540-9473
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1300/j014v10n02_07
OpenAlexW2027374483
LanguageEN
Citations received15

On July 7, 1981, President Ronald Reagan fulfilled one of his campaign promises: He appointed Judge Sandra Day O'Connor of the Arizona Court of Appeals to be the first female Justice to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court. Mostearly commentators agreed that Judge O'Connor fit the conservative mold of other Reagan appointees. Nevertheless, women's groups universally hailed her appointment as a major breakthrough for women in general and for the advancement of women's rights through the courts in particular. The simple purpose of this modest paper, which is part of a larger study, is to address the question of whether those expectations were correct. More specifically, we examine all 55 sex discrimination cases decided by the Burger Court-both before and after the appointment of Justice O'Connor-to determine her impact on the court as a whole and upon individual Justices

Economic Justice · O'Connor · Political science · Sociology · Supreme court · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Law

  • Gender and Judicial Replacement

    Open Access•Nancy Arrington•Journal of Law and Courts•2018

  • Moving Beyond Numbers

    Susan L Miller, Shana L Maier•Women & Politics•2008

  • Justice Sandra Day O'Connor and the Power or Maternal Legal Thinking

    Open Access•Susan Behuniak-Long•The Review of Politics•1992

  • To Do Justly

    Barbara Palmer•PS Political Science & Politics•2001

  • Women in the American Judiciary

    Barbara Palmer•Women & Politics•2001

  • Do Differences Matter

    Dena Levy, Charles Tien et al.•Women & Politics•2001

  • Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and the Supreme Court's Reaction to Its Second Female Member

    Barbara Palmer•Women & Politics•2002

  • Collegial Influence and Judicial Voting Change

    Open Access•Scott R Meinke, Kevin M Scott•Law & Society Review•2007

  • Gender and Voting Decisions in the US Court of Appeals

    Katherine Felix Scheurer•Women & Politics•2014

  • Judge Gender, Critical Mass, and Decision Making in the Appellate Courts of Canada

    Susan W Johnson, Donald R Songer et al.•Women & Politics•2011

  • Still Underrepresented? Gender Representation of Witnesses at House and Senate Committee Hearings

    Collin Coil, Caroline Bruckner et al.•Women & Politics•2024

  • Replacing Sandra Day O'Connor

    Michele L Swers, Christine C Kim•Women & Politics•2013

  • Judging Alone

    Open Access•Karen O''Connor, Karen O’connor et al.•Politics & Gender•2010

  • Political Party, Political Philosophy and Feminism

    Open Access•Manon Tremblay•Canadian Journal of Political…•1993

  • The Influence of African Americans on Congress

    Open Access•Charles Tien, Charles P Tien et al.•Du Bois Review Social Science…•2008

Unique citing works15
Citations per year0,44
Citation span1992 - 2024 (33)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 15

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae