Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Beyond compliance

Enhancing biodiversity through transformative mitigation strategies in spatial planning related SEAs and EIAs

Bibliographic Data

ID11368106
AuthorsLone Kørnøv (0000-0002-2989-9553, Aalborg University, corresponding author), Emilia Ravn Boess (0000-0001-9732-2185, Aalborg University), Søren Qvist Eliasen (0000-0002-2362-7418, Aalborg University), Sanne Vammen Larsen (0000-0001-7731-9296, Aalborg University), Karla E Locher-Krause, Karla E Locher‐Krause, Yuanzao Zhu (0000-0002-9801-5520), Heidi Wittmer (0000-0001-6966-7258), Lia Borges Laporta, Lia Laporta (0000-0003-4178-4537), Davide Geneletti (0000-0002-5528-3365), Margarida Barata Monteiro (0000-0001-7846-2967), Margarida Barata Moneteiro, Maria Rosario Partidario (0000-0002-5564-719X)
Year2025
Volume114
Pages107960
Publication date2025-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironmental Impact Assessment Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0195-9255 • E-ISSN: 1873-6432
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.eiar.2025.107960
OpenAlexW4410002097
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited35

The global biodiversity crisis underscores the need for transformative change in how development impacts are managed, and biodiversity is preserved. This study explores the integration of Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) and Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) within spatial planning and infrastructure projects, emphasizing their evolving role in promoting both mitigation and enhancement of impacts. Traditionally, SEAs and EIAs have focused on minimizing negative impacts through the mitigation hierarchy; however, this research advocates for a broader, proactive application that includes enhancement measures to achieve net-positive biodiversity impacts. Using a collection of 200 SEA and EIA reports from Denmark, Spain, Portugal, and Germany, analyzed within the BioValue research project, this study examines how these assessments apply the mitigation and enhancement hierarchy to promote positive outcomes. The findings reveal significant variability in the practical application of SEAs and EIAs, highlighting both strengths and gaps in integrating enhancement measures. By focusing on enhancement as a formal requirement and strengthening the ‘avoidance’ step in the mitigation hierarchy, this paper argues that SEA and EIA can transition from reactive assessments to proactive instruments in environmental governance and add value to spatial planning developments. The study concludes with recommendations for embedding enhancement into regulatory frameworks, encouraging a shift towards transformative environmental assessment practice

Biodiversity · Biology · Business · Compliance (psychology · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Fishery · Marine spatial planning · Sociology · Spatial planning · Transformative learning · Environmental and Social Impact Assessments · Environmental Conservation and Management · Environmental Science · Mining and Resource Management · Psychology · Ecology

  • Are spatial plans transformative for biodiversity and ecosystem services? Insights from seven European countries

    Open Access•M Susana Orta-Ortiz, M Susana Orta‐Ortiz et al.•European Planning Studies•2026

  • A spatially explicit environmental performance indicator accounting for different life-cycle impact pathways of onshore wind energy infrastructure

    Open Access•Spielhofer Reto, Kvalnes Thomas et al.•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2026

  • Benchmarking biodiversity integration in environmental assessments

    Lone Kørnøv, Sanne Vammen Larsen et al.•Impact Assessment and Project…•2026

  • Accelerating climate change mitigation and conserving biodiversity – the role of advanced digitalization for a fast and environmentally sound energy transition linking SEA and EIA

    Open Access•Robin Sandfort, J F Knufinke et al.•Impact Assessment and Project…•2025

  • Capturing Ipbes diverse values of nature for EIA by surfacing community values

    Open Access•Chike C Ebido, Shehanas Pazhoor et al.•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2026

  • Unpacking dimensions of a tiering typology

    Open Access•Emilia Ravn Boess, Sanne Vammen Larsen et al.•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2026

  • Sustainability Transitions Research

    Open Access•Derk Loorbach, Derk A Loorbach et al.•Annual Review of Environment and…•2017

  • Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change

    Open Access•Sandra Dı́az, Josef Settele et al.•Science•2019

  • Sustainability assessment. Pluralism, practice and progress

    Davide Geneletti•Impact Assessment and Project…•2013

  • The mitigation hierarchy upside down – a study of nature protection measures in Danish infrastructure projects

    Sanne Vammen Larsen, Lone Kørnøv et al.•Impact Assessment and Project…•2018

  • Next generation impact assessment

    A John Sinclair, Meinhard Doelle et al.•Impact Assessment and Project…•2022

  • Understanding impact assessment from other perspectives

    Annette Nykiel, Angus Morrison-Saunders•Impact Assessment and Project…•2023

  • Transforming the capacity of impact assessment to address persistent global problems

    Maria Rosario Partidario•Impact Assessment and Project…•2020

  • Handbook on biodiversity and ecosystem services in impact assessment

    Jean Hugé•Impact Assessment and Project…•2017

  • Tiering biodiversity issues from strategic environmental assessment to environmental impact assessment

    Amarilis Lucia Casteli Figueiredo Gallardo, Alex Bond•Impact Assessment and Project…•2024

  • The politics of biodiversity offsetting across time and institutional scales

    Open Access•Florence Lp Damiens, L Porter et al.•Nature Sustainability•2020

  • Transformations to sustainability

    Open Access•I Scoones, Andy Stirling et al.•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2020

  • The time is now to improve the treatment of biodiversity in Canadian environmental impact statements

    Open Access•Patrick Gannon•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2020

  • Ripe for decision”

    Open Access•Riki Therivel, Ainhoa González•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2021

  • The effectiveness of the mitigation hierarchy in environmental impact studies on marine ecosystems

    Open Access•Céline Jacob, Sylvain Pioch et al.•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2016

  • Biodiversity and bird surveys in Finnish environmental impact assessments and follow-up monitoring

    Open Access•Sanna Mäkeläinen, Aleksi Lehikoinen•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2021

  • Researchers' perspective on the main strengths and weaknesses of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) procedures

    Open Access•Andreea Nita, Stacey Fineran et al.•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2022

  • Investigating the implementation of the mitigation hierarchy approach in environmental impact assessment in relation to biodiversity impacts

    Open Access•Rocío A Cares, Ângela M A Franco et al.•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2023

  • Advancing the theory and practice of impact assessment

    Jenny Pope, Alex Bond et al.•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2013

  • A framework for evaluating enhancement quality as part of the EIA process

    Open Access•Joe Nisbet, Elsa João•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2022

  • Global environmental change II

    Open Access•Karen O’brien•Progress in Human Geography•2011

  • Exploring the governance and politics of transformations towards sustainability

    Open Access•James Patterson, Karsten Schulz et al.•Environmental Innovation and…•2016

Unique citing works6
Citations per year6
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae