Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Moving from reactive to proactive development planning to conserve Indigenous community and biodiversity values

Bibliographic Data

ID11369452
AuthorsMichael Heiner (0000-0001-7027-0813, The Nature Conservancy, corresponding author), David Hinchley (Australian Wildlife Conservancy), James Fitzsimons (0000-0003-4277-8040, Australian Wildlife Conservancy, corresponding author), Frank Weisenberger, Wayne Bergmann (Tharawal Aboriginal), Tina McMahon (Tharawal Aboriginal), Joseph Milgin (Tharawal Aboriginal), Linda Nardea (Tharawal Aboriginal), James Oakleaf, James R Oakleaf (0000-0001-5048-8356, The Nature Conservancy), Damien Parriman (Tharawal Aboriginal), Anne Poelina (0000-0001-6461-7681, Tharawal Aboriginal), Harry Watson (0000-0001-7991-3870, Tharawal Aboriginal), Kimberley Watson (Tharawal Aboriginal), Joseph M Kiesecker (0000-0002-0195-5066, The Nature Conservancy, corresponding author), Joseph Kiesecker
Year2019
Volume74
Pages1-13
Publication date2019-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironmental Impact Assessment Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0195-9255 • E-ISSN: 1873-6432
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.eiar.2018.09.002
OpenAlexW2892562171
LanguageEN
Citations received23
References cited52

Biodiversity · Business · Civil engineering · Cultural heritage · Cultural values · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Hierarchy · Indigenous · Land use · Land-use planning · Negotiation · Political science · Sociology · Spatial planning · Traditional knowledge · Engineering · Environmental and Social Impact Assessments · Environmental Conservation and Management · Environmental Science · Mining and Resource Management · Ecology

  • Connecting conservation & culture

    Open Access•Mercedes McLean, Brian D Warner et al.•Marine Policy•2023

  • Surveying the scene

    Open Access•Andrés Pazmiño, Eric A Morgan et al.•Landscape and Urban Planning•2026

  • Translating Best Practice Principles into criteria for evaluating the consideration of biodiversity in SEA practice

    Amarilis Lucia Casteli Figueiredo Gallardo, Cintia Aparecida da Conceição Dos…•Impact Assessment and Project…•2022

  • An argument for pandemic risk management using a multidisciplinary One Health approach to governance

    Open Access•Katie Woolaston, Zoe Nay et al.•Globalization and Health•2022

  • Four steps for the Earth

    Open Access•E J Milner-Gulland, Prue Addison et al.•One Earth•2021

  • Inclusion, Transparency, and Enforcement

    Open Access•Laura Kehoe, Tiago N P dos Reis et al.•One Earth•2020

  • Conceptualizing Hydro-socio-ecological Relationships to Enable More Integrated and Inclusive Water Allocation Planning

    Open Access•Michael M Douglas, Jackson et al.•One Earth•2019

  • Indigenous Peoples’ lands are threatened by industrial development; conversion risk assessment reveals need to support Indigenous stewardship

    Open Access•Cynthia M Kennedy, Brandie Fariss et al.•One Earth•2023

  • Net Gain

    Open Access•Julia P G Jones, Joseph W Bull et al.•One Earth•2019

  • Talk is cheap

    Open Access•James E M Watson, Jeremy S Simmonds et al.•One Earth•2021

  • Strategic planning to mitigate mining impacts on protected areas in the Brazilian Amazon

    Open Access•Juliana Siqueira-Gay, Jean Paul Metzger et al.•Nature Sustainability•2022

  • Participatory multi-stakeholder assessment of alternative development scenarios in contested landscapes

    Open Access•Milena Kiatkoski Kim, Jorge G Álvarez‐Romero et al.•Sustainability Science•2021

  • Wetland Park Planning and Management Based on the Valuation of Ecosystem Services

    Open Access•Lu Yang, Zhi Zhang et al.•International Journal of…•2023

  • Digital twins and the digital logics of biodiversity

    Open Access•Michelle Westerlaken•Social Studies of Science•2024

  • Incorporating local nature-based cultural values into biodiversity No Net Loss strategies

    Open Access•Victoria F Griffiths, Joseph W Bull et al.•World Development•2020

  • The times are changing

    Open Access•Mirjam Hazenbosch, Shen Sui et al.•World Development•2021

  • Capturing Ipbes diverse values of nature for EIA by surfacing community values

    Open Access•Chike C Ebido, Shehanas Pazhoor et al.•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2026

  • Barriers and opportunities to incorporating environmental justice in the National Environmental Policy act

    Open Access•Nicola Ulibarri, Omar Perez Figueroa et al.•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2022

  • Delivering an analytical framework for evaluating the delivery of biodiversity objectives at strategic and project levels of impact assessment

    Open Access•Amarilis Lucia Casteli Figueiredo Gallardo, Alex Bond•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2023

  • For whom do NGOs speak? Accountability and legitimacy in pursuit of just environmental impact assessment

    Open Access•Jia Yen Lai, A Hamilton•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2020

  • Protecting wetlands for future generations

    Open Access•Shivukumar Rakkasagi, Manish Kumar Goyal•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2025

  • Evaluating the match between natural ecosystem service supply and cultural ecosystem service demand

    Open Access•Chang You, Hongjiao Qu et al.•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2024

  • Towards making EIA more human-centric

    Open Access•Shehanas Pazhoor, Swastik Pandey et al.•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2025

  • Policy Development for Biodiversity Offsets

    Open Access•Bruce A McKenney, Bruce McKenney et al.•Environmental Management•2010

  • Conflict translates environmental and social risk into business costs

    Open Access•Daniel M Franks, Rachel Davis et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2014

  • Where are Cultural and Social in Ecosystem Services? A Framework for Constructive Engagement

    Kai M A Chan, Anne D Guerry et al.•BioScience•2012

  • Contested Terrain

    Open Access•Gavin Bridge•Annual Review of Environment and…•2004

  • Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World

    David M Olson, E Dinerstein et al.•BioScience•2001

  • Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment

    Open Access•Kai M A Chan, Patricia Balvanera et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2016

  • Cultural impact assessment

    Adriana Partal, Kim Dunphy•Impact Assessment and Project…•2016

  • International Principles For Social Impact Assessment

    Frank Vanclay•Impact Assessment and Project…•2003

  • Human rights, Indigenous peoples and the concept of Free, Prior and Informed Consent

    Philippe Hanna, Frank Vanclay•Impact Assessment and Project…•2013

  • Environmental impact assessment

    Richard Morgan, Richard K Morgan•Impact Assessment and Project…•2012

  • Integrated Measures of Indigenous Land and Sea Management Effectiveness

    Open Access•BeauJ Austin, Cathy Robinson et al.•Conservation and Society•2018

  • Healthy Country, Healthy People

    Open Access•Stephen T Garnett, Bev Sithole et al.•Australian Journal of Public…•2009

  • An overview of land use conflicts in mining communities

    Open Access•Gavin Hilson•Land Use Policy•2002

  • Social impact assessments

    Open Access•Antonio Arce-Gomez, Jerome D Donovan et al.•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2015

  • Mitigation for one & all

    Open Access•Heather Tallis, Cynthia M Kennedy et al.•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2015

  • Water Ways in Aboriginal Australia

    Toussaint, Sandy Toussaint et al.•Anthropological Forum•2005

  • Aquatic Resource Use by Indigenous Australians in Two Tropical River Catchments

    Open Access•Jackson, Sue Jackson et al.•Human Ecology•2012

Unique citing works23
Citations per year3.29
Citation span2019 - 2026 (8)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 23

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae