Characterizing dam fragmentation impacts on freshwater fish within life cycle impact assessment
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11369984 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sif de Visser (0000-0001-6806-3065, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, corresponding author), Valerio Barbarossa (0000-0002-0519-6968, Leiden University), Tamara Keijzer (Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency), Francesca Verones (0000-0002-2908-328X, Norwegian University of Science and Technology), Martin Dorber (0000-0001-8477-1934, Norwegian University of Science and Technology) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 114 |
| Pages | 107929 |
| Publication date | 2025-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Environmental Impact Assessment Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0195-9255 • E-ISSN: 1873-6432 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.eiar.2025.107929 |
| OpenAlex | W4408902154 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 67 |
Damming-induced fragmentation hinders crucial fish migration for feeding and spawning and alters habitat quality. However, the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) framework lacks a model to quantify the impacts of freshwater habitat fragmentation. Our proposed methodology addresses this gap by developing characterization factors (CFs) with global coverage for the isolation risk of 7369 freshwater fish species. We use a macroecological range size-body size relationship to determine species' Minimum Viable Range Size (MVRS) and apply it to assess range fragmentation caused by 31,870 dams. To consider multipurpose reservoirs, we allocate the quantified impact in Potentially Disappeared Fraction of species (PDF) based on a ranking approach. The CFs express global quantified impact and range from 0 to 2.39·10 −12 PDF·yr·m −3 for hydropower for 524 basins, and from 0 to 3.17·10 −07 PDF·yr·m −3 for irrigation for 1355 basins worldwide. We calculate a weighted mean from the CFs per basin to obtain a global CF. This CF is 3.89·10 −15 PDF·yr·m −3 (± 2.01·10 −14 weighted standard deviation) for hydropower and 7.66·10 −14 PDF·yr·m −3 (± 2.27·10 −12 weighted standard deviation) for irrigation. Applying the hydropower and irrigation CFs to a global case study for the operation of a hydropower plant and the production of basmati rice shows that the impact scores for fragmentation exceed those for land inundation and global warming but not for water consumption. In the case of Norway, the hydropower-induced fragmentation impact scores are the highest. This shows the importance of including freshwater fragmentation in decision-making tools such as LCA. • The first characterization factors for freshwater fragmentation. • Includes fragmentation impacts due to hydropower and irrigation. • Quantifies the isolation effect for freshwater fish species. • Increases coverage of biodiversity impacts in life cycle assessment
Biology · Economics · Environmental impact assessment · Fish · Fishery · Fragmentation (computing · Impact assessment · Life-cycle assessment · Political science · Environmental Science · Fish Ecology and Management Studies · Law · Water resources management and optimization · Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies · Ecology
Impact 2002
The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I)
Mapping the world’s free-flowing rivers
High‐resolution mapping of the world's reservoirs and dams for sustainable river‐flow management
Global river hydrography and network routing
Riverine Ecosystem Management
Strategic restoration-development mitigates tradeoffs between hydropower and fish habitat fragmentation in the Mekong
Hydropower versus irrigation—an analysis of global patterns
Safeguarding migratory fish via strategic planning of future small hydropower in Brazil
Quantifying net water consumption of Norwegian hydropower reservoirs and related aquatic biodiversity impacts in Life Cycle Assessment
Including biodiversity in life cycle assessment – State of the art, gaps and research needs
Is small hydropower beautiful? Social impacts of river fragmentation in China’s Red River Basin
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |