Stakeholders' manipulation of Environmental Impact Assessment
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11370503 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Álvaro Enríquez-de-Salamanca (0000-0002-8492-5216, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 68 |
| Pages | 10-18 |
| Publication date | 2018-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Environmental Impact Assessment Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0195-9255 • E-ISSN: 1873-6432 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.eiar.2017.10.003 |
| OpenAlex | W2764219098 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 36 |
| References cited | 52 |
Business · Environmental impact assessment · Political science · Process (computing · Process management · Public relations · Risk analysis (engineering · Spurious relationship · Stakeholder · Computer Science · Environmental and Social Impact Assessments · Law · Mining and Resource Management · Risk Perception and Management
The game mechanism of stakeholders in comprehensive marine environmental governance
Mapping the truth about mining
Making sense of how proponents conspire to thwart environmental impact assessment processes
Multi-project environmental impact assessment
A framework of stakeholder analysis for public participation in EIA process
Impacts of offshore wind farms
AI in strategic planning and assessment – a game changer in decision-making or a risk for reproduction of hidden biases
Effect characterization in social impact assessment
Evaluating the effectiveness of a national environmental and social impact assessment system
Compensation for displacement caused by dam building
Scholar and practitioner views on science in environmental assessment
Regimes of Environmental Truth
Social Impact Assessment of Reconstruction Projects in the Historical Districts Case Study
Masters of mankind
Boom times for technocrats? How environmental consulting companies shape mining governance
Scaffolding civic infrastructures
Environmental Impact Assessment of Uranium Mining on Indigenous Land in Labrador (Canada)
Research on Modern Marine Environmental Governance in China
A historical review of the cumulative science in SEA effectiveness
Communication problems and alternatives in the process of collecting resident opinions for environmental impact assessment through text mining
Approval of transport infrastructure projects and systemic differences in EIA approaches
An empirical study of EIA litigation involving energy facilities in Chile and Colombia
Cumulative collision risk and population-level consequences of industrial wind-power plant development for two vulture species
Investigating communication of findings in Environmental Impact Assessment and developing a research agenda for improvement
Role of and challenges to environmental impact assessment proponents in Pakistan
Public participation in China's EIA process and the regulation of environmental disputes
Analytic deliberation approach for collaborative determination of impact significance of projects in dispute, a case study in Mexico
Are Environmental Impact Assessments effectively addressing the biodiversity issues in Brazil
Assessing the environmental impacts of construction in Antarctica
Researchers' perspective on the main strengths and weaknesses of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) procedures
The state of environmental justice analyses in Nepa
Regulating human interventions in Colombian coastal areas
Fuzzy-based computational intelligence to support screening decision in environmental impact assessment
Examining the effects of social protest on the environmental impact assessment process in Chile
Challenges to EIA consultants whilst dealing with stakeholders in Punjab, Pakistan
Project justification and EIA
Policy and Planning for Large-Infrastructure Projects
Underestimating Costs in Public Works Projects
Application of multicriteria decision analysis in environmental decision making
What Is Wrong With Eia and Sea Anyway? A Sceptic's Perspective on Sustainability Assessment
Environmental assessments in the Internet age
Project splitting in environmental impact assessment
Demonstrating the benefits of impact assessment for proponents
Impact assessment
Meta-analysis of EIA public hearings in the state of Gujarat, India
Public participation in environmental impact assessment in Spain
Lessons for impact assessment from the UK referendum on BREXIT
Public hearings in environmental and social impact assessment for energy sector projects in Cameroon
Uncertainty in environmental impact assessment predictions
Environmental impact assessment
Environmental impact assessment process substitution
Environmental impact assessment in Queensland, Australia
Corruption in Economic Development
The Logic of Critical Communicative Planning
Adapting the Environmental Impact Statement Process to Inform Decisionmakers
Public participation in EIA of nuclear power plant decommissioning projects
An evaluation framework for effective public participation in EIA in Pakistan
Deciding over nature
Public participation in environmental impact assessment—implementing the Aarhus Convention
Why are some experts more credible than others
Setting boundaries of participation in environmental impact assessment
Evaluating the effectiveness of impact assessment instruments
Public participation in eia in hungary
Parallel public participation
The roles of EIA in the decision-making process
Environmental assessment and planning theory
Public hearings for EIAs in post-communist Bulgaria
Evaluating public participation in Chinese EIA. An integrated Public Participation Index and its application to the case of the New Beijing Airport
The role of science in environmental impact assessment
Everything you already know about EIA (but don't often admit)
Public education
Citizen Language and Administrative Response
The inherent biases in environmental research and their effects on public policy
A rationale for science–policy interfaces
Elite Power, Manipulation and Corruption
Cleaning up the big muddy
| Unique citing works | 36 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 4,5 |
| Citation span | 2018 - 2026 (9) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 36 |