Is there an Autonomist Model of Political Communication
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11372099 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nicholas Thoburn (0000-0003-3624-4579, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2011 |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 335-341 |
| Publication date | 2011-10-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Communication Inquiry (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0196-8599 • E-ISSN: 1552-4612 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0196859911415676 |
| OpenAlex | W2016893998 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 13 |
This article explores the different models of political communication that inhere in Hardt and Negri’s Empire trilogy, models that are explicit and implicit, intended and accidental, dominant and latent. From their existence tangled up in Hardt and Negri’s work, I draw out for consideration the communicative models of the rhizome-book, manifesto, textbook, mass-market book, autonomous language, and political journal. My aim is less to evaluate the relative dominance of these models in the trilogy, than to take the opportunity this work offers for thinking political communication as specifically communist problematic, a somewhat neglected field of inquiry
Art · Communism · Dominance (genetics · Empire · Epistemology · Field (mathematics · Linguistic turn · Literature · Manifesto · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Trilogy · Critical Theory and Philosophy · Law · Philosophy · Political Economy and Marxism · Political theory and Gramsci
Commonwealth
The dialectic of enlightenment
Deleuze, Marx and Politics
Have Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri Rewritten the Communist Manifesto for the Twenty-First Century
Imagined communities
A thousand plateaus
What is to be done? Burning questions of our movement
Imagined Communities. Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism
Dialectic of Enlightenment
Autonomous Production
The Global Coliseum
| Highly cited | No |
|---|