An Experimental Approach to Understanding Thule Pottery Technology

Bibliographic Data

ID11380209
AuthorsK G Harry (0000-0002-8694-2503, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, corresponding author), Liam Frink (University of Nevada, Las Vegas), Clint Swink (Swink Art), Cory Dangerfield (Dangerfield Design)
Year2009
Volume30
Issue3
Pages291-311
Publication date2009-07-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueNorth American Archaeologist (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0197-6931 • E-ISSN: 1541-3543
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.2190/na.30.3.c
OpenAlexW1966516414
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited15

The Arctic is poorly suited for pottery manufacture. For historic and prehistoric potters, the cool humid weather would have meant that clays were collected wet, that pots were formed and dried under humid conditions, and that the ground and fuels used during firing would be damp. These situations would have created substantial problems for potters. To investigate how these issues might have affected Thule pottery production, in 2004 the authors initiated a series of replication experiments. These experiments, informed by ethnographic accounts, were carried out in Tununak, Alaska and on the campus of the University of Nevada Las Vegas. Results of our experiments confirm the extreme difficulties associated with making pots in the Arctic. Additionally, they inform on the effects of some of the manufacturing techniques reported to have been used historically and shed light on why Arctic potters might have made the technological choices that they did

Archaeology · Arctic · Geography · Las vegas · Metropolitan area · Pottery · Prehistory · The arctic · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies · Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction · Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology · Geology · Oceanography

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub