Refining the Understanding of Large Cutting Tool Technology in the Baise Basin, South China
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11380833 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lei Lei (0000-0002-3366-1855, Guizhou University), Matt G Lotter (0000-0002-8257-2162, Palaeo-Research Institute, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park, South Africa), Dawei Li (0000-0002-3891-5033, Institute for History and Culture of Science & Technology, Guangxi University for Nationalities, Nanning, People’s Republic of China), Kathleen Kuman (0000-0003-1252-9895, University of the Witwatersrand), Hao Li (0000-0001-5192-5458, Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, People’s Republic of China, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 87-103 |
| Publication date | 2021-04-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Lithic Technology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0197-7261 • E-ISSN: 2051-6185 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/01977261.2020.1841958 |
| OpenAlex | W3099425730 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 10 |
| References cited | 42 |
Ever since the first discovery of handaxes in the 1970s in the Baise (Bose) Basin in South China, this region has been providing important data that have improved our understanding of Large Cutting Tool (LCT) technology in China. However, presently there are still some obvious shortfalls in our understanding of this very significant cultural paleolandscape. For instance, previous studies have only analyzed small or incomplete sub-samples of much larger collections, especially of the LCTs often from surface contexts, and in addition recent studies have also largely focused on the analysis of LCT morphological indices, versus adopting a more holistic approach that considers fundamental technological attributes. As a result, this study aims to provide a more detailed quantitative assessment of an expanded LCT and artifact sample, and furthermore, provide important insight into the spatial and temporal variability of Large Cutting Tool technology from a wider geographical and environmental perspective
Archaeology · Artifact (error · China · Data science · Geography · Perspective (graphical · Sample (material · Stone tool · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies · Archaeology and Rock Art Studies · Computer Science · Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology · Artificial Intelligence
First 40Ar/39Ar analyses of Australasian tektites in close association with bifacially worked artifacts at Nalai site in Bose Basin, South China
The first lithic industry of mainland Southeast Asia
New discovery of Acheulean artifacts from the fluvial gravel bed of terminal Early Pleistocene in Bose Basin, southern China
Tip of the Tongue”
Comparing morphological variability in handaxes from Penhill Farm and Amanzi Springs, Eastern Cape, South Africa
Victoria West-like Core Technology from Fengshudao, an Early–Middle Pleistocene Site in Bose Basin, South China
Mobility and settlement dynamics of Large Cutting Tool makers in the subtropical forests of South China
The lithic assemblage from the 700,000-year-old butchery site of Kalinga (Luzon Island, Philippines)
The Multivariate Basis of Human Brain Evolution
Lakhuti-IV
The oldest hand-axes in Europe
Title unavailable
Inter-continental Variation in Acheulean Bifaces
Out of Africa
Kalambo Falls Prehistoric Site III. The Earlier Cultures
The Rietputs 15 site and Early Acheulean in South Africa
Nadaouiyeh Aïn Askar, an example of Upper Acheulean variability in the Levant
Recent Paleolithic field investigations in Bose Basin (Guangxi, China)
Age of newly discovered Paleolithic assemblages at Liuwan site Luonan Basin, central China
The Middle Pleistocene handaxe site of Shuangshu in the Danjiangkou Reservoir Region, central China
Large Flake Acheulian in India
Acheulean handaxes from Fengshudao, Bose sites of South China
Is the Dingcun lithic assembly a “chopper-chopping tool industry”, or “Late Acheulian”
The Lower Palaeolithic Cultures of Southern and Eastern Asia
Large flake Acheulian
Acheulian Large Flake Industries
Re-examination of the morphological variability of East Asian handaxes from a comparative perspective
Large cutting tool variation west and east of the Movius Line
Middle Pleistocene handaxes from the Korean Peninsula
Stratigraphy, artefact industries and hominid associations for Sterkfontein, Member 5
Early Acheulean technology in the Rietputs Formation, South Africa, dated with cosmogenic nuclides
The Movius Line sensu lato (Norton et al., 2006) further assessed and defined
The Early Stone Age lithic assemblages of Gadeb (Ethiopia) and the Developed Oldowan/early Acheulean in East Africa
Middle Pleistocene bifaces from Fengshudao (Bose Basin, Guangxi, China)
Large cutting tools in the Danjiangkou Reservoir Region, central China
Technological behaviour in the early Acheulean of EF-HR (Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania)
How old are the Bose (Baise) Basin (Guangxi, southern China) bifaces? The Australasian tektites question revisited
The Large Cutting Tools from the South African Acheulean and the Question of Social Traditions
Excavations at the Palaeolithic Site of Attirampakkam, South India
Diversity and multiplicity in the Asian Acheulian
| Unique citing works | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 10 |