History and Poetry in William Shakespeare’s Lucrece

This essay demonstrates the interrelationship between the historical source (Livy, Ab Urbe Condita LVIII-LX) and the literary source (Ovid, Fasti, II. 721-852) present in the construction, or rather, in “the artistic scheme,” of Shakespeare’s Rape of Lucrece. The “Argument,” written in prose and the text of the narrative poem reveal Shakespeare’s synchronic engagement with both Clio and Calliope. The synergistic interaction between the two parts proves that Shakespeare either consciously or unconsciously joined the ongoing discussion on the interaction between history and poetry. Falling in line with the sixteenth-century debate on the credibility of historical sources, the reading of Lucrece encourages the reader to judge the so-called authenticity or actuality of past events as depicted in different genres of literary texts. In other words, as a two-part structure Shakespeare’s Lucrece invites the analysis of the relationship between history/historiography and poetry, in which one of the essential elements is the question of the process of interpreting both historical and poetic narrative texts and their use of language, style, form and literary genre

Argument (complex analysis · Art · Historiography · Linguistics · Literature · Narrative · Poetry · Reading (process · Style (visual arts · History · Philosophy · Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism

• The Race of Time

  Hershel Baker•Race of Time•1967

  Add to list

• Metahistory

  Hayden White•Metahistory•1973

  Add to list

• The reversible world

  Forms of Symbolic Inversion Symposium, Barbara A Babcock et al.•The reversible world•1978

  Add to list

• The Myth of Rome in Shakespeare and his Contemporaries

  Open Access•Warren Chernaik•Myth of Rome in Shakespeare and…•2011

  Add to list