Faiblesses, embûches et abus dans les analyses avantages-coûts de projets
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11401290 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Fernand Martin (Université de Montréal, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1991 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 89-105 |
| Publication date | 1991-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d études du développement (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0225-5189 • E-ISSN: 2158-9100 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/02255189.1991.9669422 |
| OpenAlex | W2041808969 |
| Language | FR |
| References cited | 1 |
Errors in cost-benefit analyses pertain to the misuse of the results and to the pitfalls met in the completion of such studies. Because of the working hypotheses of the methods, in countries where there is no planning or where the Plan is not followed, it is more prudent to rely upon shadow-pricing than upon the so-called “effects method”. The article also shows how to look for weak points in the computations of the studies and it lists the most prevalent errors
Archaeology · Geography · Mathematical optimization · Operations research · Plan (archaeology · Political science · Regional science · Shadow (psychology · Shadow price · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Efficiency Analysis Using DEA · Engineering · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Mathematics · Psychology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|