Can the Grameen Bank Be Replicated in Africa? Evidence from Malawi
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11401403 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Winford H Masanjala (Louisiana State University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2002 |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 87-103 |
| Publication date | 2002-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d études du développement (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0225-5189 • E-ISSN: 2158-9100 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/02255189.2002.9668855 |
| OpenAlex | W2009271114 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 5 |
Although success stories of microcredit schemes from Asia have generated a lot of enthusiasm among development practitioners about the prospects of rural poverty alleviation, informed opinion is still sharply divided on the efficacy of this instrument in Africa. Using evidence from FINCA-Malawi, this paper empirically questions the replicability of Grameen-type banks in Africa. While the credit scheme was financially sustainable and FINCA clients had higher savings, working capital and business expenditure, these did not translate into higher household consumption. Clients' risk aversion in investment and uncharacteristically high turnover rates seem to explain the low program impact on the household economy
Business · Capital (architecture · Consumption (sociology · Development economics · Economic growth · Economics · Enthusiasm · Geography · Investment (military · Micro credit · Microfinance · Political science · Poverty · South asia · Innovation and Socioeconomic Development · Microfinance and Financial Inclusion · Urban and Rural Development Challenges
Microenterprise finance
Microenterprise credit programs
The contribution of small enterprises to employment growth in southern and eastern Africa
A critique of traditional agricultural credit projects and policies
Micro-finance evangelism, 'destitute women', and the hard selling of a new anti-poverty formula
| Citations per year | 0.14 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2012 - 2017 (6) |
| Highly cited | No |