La adquisición de las relaciones entre prosodia e intención comunicativa
Primeras asociaciones entre forma y función
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11415263 |
|---|---|
| Authors | María Fernández-Flecha (0000-0002-2699-2509, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, corresponding author), María de los Ángeles Fernández Flecha |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 5-33 |
| Publication date | 2014-07-31 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Lexis (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0254-9239 • E-ISSN: 2223-3768 |
| Publisher | Sistema de Bibliotecas PUCP (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.18800/lexis.201401.001 |
| OpenAlex | W1525432484 |
| Language | ES |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 16 |
El presente artículo aborda la relación entre la intención comunicativa y la prosodia de las vocalizaciones producidas por infantes de entre 16 y 24 meses de edad. Los resultados muestran que (1) las vocalizaciones comunicativas y no comunicativas no se diferencian de forma significativa a partir de su contorno entonativo final (ascendente, descendente o suspensivo), (2) aunque sí a partir de su frecuencia fundamental, más alta en el caso de las vocalizaciones comunicativas; y que (3) las funciones comunicativas tempranas (declarativa, imperativa, expresiva, mímica, guía de acción y “relleno” conversacional) se diferencian por su contorno entonativo final y, también, más marcadamente, (4) por su frecuencia fundamental, más alta en los imperativos (y vocalizaciones expresivas) que en los declarativos.Palabras clave: intención comunicativa, función comunicativa, prosodia, adquisición del lenguajeAbstractThis paper deals with the relation between communicative intention and prosody in vocalizations uttered by infants 16 to 24 months-old. Results show that (1) communicative and non-communicative vocalizations are not significantly different based on pitch final contour (rising, falling and flat), (2) but show significantly different fundamental frequency values, which are higher in communicative vocalizations; and that (3) early communicative functions (declarative, imperative, emotive, mimic, action guide, and conversational “filling”) can be differentiated based on their final pitch contour and, more clearly, (4) on their fundamental frequency, which is overall higher in imperatives (and emotive vocalizations) than in declaratives.Keywords: communicative intention, communicative function, prosody, language acquisition
Emotive · Humanities · Linguistics · Prosody · Language Development and Disorders · Philosophy · Phonetics and Phonology Research · Psychology · Speech and dialogue systems
Logic and Conversation
Communicative functions of pitch range and pitch direction in infants
Selective production of vocalization types in different communication contexts
Relations between prosodic variables and communicative functions
Development of prosodic patterns in Mandarin-learning infants
Prelinguistic pitch patterns expressing ‘communication’ and ‘apprehension’
Non-segmental features in prelinguistic communications
Do children produce the melody before the words? A review of developmental intonation research
Beginnings of Prosodic Organization
Infants communicate in order to be understood
A pragmatic description of early language development
The adaptation and application of relational and independent analyses for intonation production in young children
Prosody in production at the onset of word use
Phonological development
From Babbling to Speech
Speech Acts
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,2 |
| Citation span | 2016 - 2021 (6) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |