Roseoau's contribution
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11426329 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Steve Smith (0000-0002-0607-2393, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1983 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 137-146 |
| Publication date | 1983-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Review of International Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0260-2105 • E-ISSN: 1469-9044 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0260210500115827 |
| OpenAlex | W2132687672 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 3 |
For anyone interested in tracing the development of the comparative study of foreign policy behaviour the work of James Rosenau is central. His work in the 1960s was a major impetus in the formation of an identifiable research community in the United States; and the problems which he has addressed since that time have been the problems of comparative foreign policy analysis writ large. Above all, his work, exactly because it has attracted such sustained and widespread attention, has served as a focal point for a critique of the very possibility of the comparative analysis of foreign policy behaviour. Like it or loathe it, Rosenau's work represents the clearest and most extensive example of the comparative foreign policy school of thought
Comparative research · Foreign policy · Law and economics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Social science · Sociology · Work (physics · Writ · Engineering · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Public Administration
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,05 |
| Citation span | 2006 - 2006 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |