Liberalism since the Cold War
An enemy to itself
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11427005 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Geoffrey Hawthorn (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1999 |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 145-160 |
| Publication date | 1999-12-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Review of International Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0260-2105 • E-ISSN: 1469-9044 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s026021059900145x |
| OpenAlex | W2070289470 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
Many expected that after the Cold War, there would be peace, order, increasing prosperity in expanding markets and the extension and eventual consolidation of civil and political rights. There would be a new world order, and it would in these ways be liberal. In international politics, the United States would be supreme. It would through security treaties command the peace in western Europe and east Asia; through its economic power command it in eastern Europe and Russia; through clients and its own domination command it in the Middle East; through tacit understanding command it in Latin America; and, in so far as any state could, command it in Africa also. It could choose whether to cooperate in the United Nations, and if it did not wish to do so, be confident that it would not be disablingly opposed by illiberal states. In the international markets, it would be able to maintain holdings of its bonds. In the international financial institutions, it would continue to be decisive in the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank; it would be an important influence in the regional development banks; and it would be powerful in what it was to insist in 1994 should be called the World (rather than Multinational) Trade Organisation. Other transactions in the markets, it is true, would be beyond the control of any state. But they would not be likely to conflict with the interests of the United States (and western Europe) in finance, investment and trade, and would discipline other governments
Economics · International trade · Multinational corporation · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Prosperity · State (computer science · Global Financial Crisis and Policies · Law · State Capitalism and Financial Governance
| Citations per year | 0.22 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2003 - 2023 (21) |
| Highly cited | No |