Peace research
Is a distinction between ‘insiders’ and ‘outsiders’ useful
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11427264 |
|---|---|
| Authors | David J Dunn (0000-0002-3808-3249, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1983 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 71-77 |
| Publication date | 1983-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Review of International Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0260-2105 • E-ISSN: 1469-9044 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s026021050011575x |
| OpenAlex | W2128913784 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 4 |
In the October, 1982, issue of the Review , John Baylis presented a series of observations on recent issues in peace research and peace education. Such comments are most welcome, for they represent at least the beginning of a dialogue between peace researchers and ‘outsiders’. This dialogue is long overdue. It is not surprising that its start has been delayed for, as Baylis points out, the debates and conflicts within peace research itself may have retarded its wider acceptance. Yet it could be argued that, having been left to get itself together, peace research is now better placed to make itself known to a wide audience of outsiders. If this is the case, then the phase of establishing an identity, the period of confusion, doubt and debate, may be concluded, with positive results. Such a thesis informs the following remarks, which contrast with those of Baylis; though in some respects I am in agreement with him
Aesthetics · Confusion · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Identity (music · Peace and conflict studies · Period (music · Political science · Psychoanalysis · Sociology · Indian History and Philosophy · Law · Peace and Human Rights Education · Peacebuilding and International Security · Philosophy · Psychology
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |