Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

England's political/institutional influences on Neapolitan constitutionalism, 1820–21

Bibliographic Data

ID11427441
AuthorsMaria Sofia Corciulo (Sapienza University of Rome, corresponding author)
Year2008
Volume28
Issue1
Pages69-78
Publication date2008-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueParliaments Estates and Representation (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0260-6755 • E-ISSN: 1947-248X
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/02606755.2008.9522275
OpenAlexW2083115780
LanguageEN

This article examines England's political/institutional influences on the rise and development of Neapolitan constitutionalism and the attitude taken by the English government toward the Neapolitan constitutional experiment in 1820–21. The Neapolitan Constitution of 1820 was lifted almost entirely from Spain's Cadiz Constitution of 1812. It called for a single-chamber system: a national assembly elected by three-degree universal suffrage, endowed with broad legislative powers only weakly checked by the sovereign. It was a model quite different from the British one, but the central role that the Parliament assumed during this constitutional experiment (it had to supervise both the political and administrative life of the Neapolitans, and to give them justice for the wrongs they had suffered) represented an important point of contact with British political customs. The Neapolitan Constitution was also a reaction against the centralist state that the Bourbon Restoration had inherited from the Napoleonic era. In this sense, England's self-government model was more present among the Neapolitans' desiderata than they themselves even knew. English public opinion was in favour of the Neapolitan Revolution, and the Neapolitans believed that there was a precise link between the enthusiasm with which British public opinion had welcomed the revolution and the political conduct of its government. That was not the case: the attitude of the English government was characterized right from the start by considerable ambiguity. It adopted an ambiguous policy of neutrality and offered no help to the Neapolitan revolutionaries in the difficult time when they were fighting the Holy Alliance's armies

Constitution · Constitutionalism · Democracy · Enthusiasm · Federalism · Government (linguistics · Legislature · Parliament · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Sovereignty · Universal suffrage · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Historical Economic and Social Studies · Historical Studies on Spain · Law

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae