Inter-parliamentary relations in the United Kingdom
Devolution’s undiscovered country
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11428284 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Adam Evans (0000-0003-4150-1517, Wales Governance Centre, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 98-112 |
| Publication date | 2019-01-02 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Parliaments Estates and Representation (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0260-6755 • E-ISSN: 1947-248X |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/02606755.2018.1487648 |
| OpenAlex | W2810002991 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
Since 1997, the United Kingdom’s territorial constitution has undergone an immense process of change and has resulted in the establishment of separate legislatures and governments for the peoples of Scotland, Wales and, when Stormont is operational, Northern Ireland. These changes have spawned a whole series of relationships between the institutions of the devolved UK, at executive, legislature and civil service levels. However, while intergovernmental relations has been the subject of repeated debate, there has been little attempt to document and examine the way in which the UK’s four legislatures interact with one another, post-devolution. To the extent that these interactions, otherwise known as inter-parliamentary relations (IPR), have been the subject of scrutiny, it has been largely to bemoan their modest state and/or to suggest that stronger, albeit occasionally rather unelaborated, mechanisms be established. This article seeks to correct this deficit and provide a first step towards a clearer understanding of IPR in the UK, post-devolution. The article breaks the different levels of IPR down into three main strands: (1) parliament-parliament, (2) committee-committee and (3) official-official, and suggests that the main interactions that take place at each of these levels. Following this audit, the article concludes by highlighting the role that shared policy competence (a field that is set to grow with the UK’s withdrawal from the European Union) has played in driving IPR in the UK, post-devolution, and suggests some steps that may be taken to enhance IPR in the future
Competence (human resources · Constitution · Devolution (biology · Economics · Legislature · Management · Parliament · Political science · Politics · Scrutiny · Sociology · Irish and British Studies · Law · Political Systems and Governance · Public Administration · Scottish History and National Identity
| Citations per year | 0.43 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2019 - 2025 (7) |
| Highly cited | No |