Petitions and ‘legitimate’ engagement with power in absolutist Denmark 1660–1800
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11428299 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Thomas Munck (0000-0002-8856-4112, University of Glasgow, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 378-391 |
| Publication date | 2018-09-02 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Parliaments Estates and Representation (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0260-6755 • E-ISSN: 1947-248X |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/02606755.2018.1532654 |
| OpenAlex | W2896423670 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
Petitioning was universal across early modern Europe, but worked differently within distinct polities. Denmark-Norway became, after 1660, an absolute hereditary dual monarchy, with no further meetings of the Estates, and no other formal representative structures. The crown, however, did fully acknowledge the right to petition, confirming the mechanism and the legal basis for doing so in the full law code of 1683, Danske Lov. Petitions from all levels of society were processed in the central bureaucracy, and those processed through the Chancellery (Danske Kancelli) can be analysed systematically. However, a number of petitions were handled separately in the Exchequer (Rentekammer) or through the legal system. This article discusses the different types of petitions to the Danish crown, and analyses some examples that illustrate not merely the complicated negotiation of power within an absolute monarchy, but also the kind of language and cultural conventions necessary for the system to work
Absolute (philosophy · Absolute power · Bureaucracy · Danish · Linguistics · Monarchy · Negotiation · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Theology · European and International Law Studies · Historical Influence and Diplomacy · Historical Legal Studies and Society · Law · Philosophy
| Citations per year | 0.43 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2019 - 2023 (5) |
| Highly cited | No |