When the US far-right sneezes, the European far-right catches a cold. Quasi-experimental evidence of electoral contagion from Spain
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11435360 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Stuart J Turnbull-Dugarte (0000-0002-9330-3945, University of Southampton, corresponding author), Jander Rama (0000-0002-3990-1696, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 76 |
| Pages | 102443 |
| Publication date | 2022-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Electoral Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0261-3794 • E-ISSN: 1873-6890 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.electstud.2022.102443 |
| OpenAlex | W4210738236 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
| References cited | 49 |
Does the electoral defeat of a far-right party abroad influence support for similar parties at home? In this paper we posit, and test, the theoretical argument that signals of viability and popularity akin to bandwagon and titanic effects operate beyond the confines of national boundaries to cause voters to update domestic preferences based on comparable party performance abroad. By exploiting the quasi-experimental setting provided by the coincidental timing of Donald Trump's 2020 electoral defeat with the Spanish sociological study's monthly barometer data collection, we provide robust causal evidence to show that Trump's electoral loss in the US had a negative contagious spillover effect on self-reported support for the Spanish far-right. Empirically we estimate intent-to-treat effects based on the as good as random exposure to the electoral results to isolate the impact of Trump's defeat on the voting intentions for Spain's new far-right party, VOX. Our results - which are robust to various modelling approaches including covariate adjustment, regional fixed effects, placebo issues, and nearest-neighbour matching - demonstrate that Trump's defeat to Joe Biden had a sizeable negative effect on expressed support for VOX. The contagion effect is substantive: equal to 3 to 6 percentage-points among the general population and 11 percentage-points among former right-wing voters. Our findings make an important contribution to the broader literature on electoral behaviour as they indicate that the electoral success of ideologically symmetrical parties abroad can play a role in understanding a party's domestic success by serving as an important information signal of these parties' electoral viability
Argument (complex analysis · Bandwagon effect · Demographic economics · Econometrics · Economics · Endogeneity · Microeconomics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Popularity · Population · Referendum · Salience (neuroscience · Sociology · Spillover effect · Turnout · Voting · Demography · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Media Influence and Politics · Populism, Right-Wing Movements · Psychology
Challenging the ruler by visiting the voter
The Trump treatment
A Misinformation Insurrection
Anti-immigration party success abroad and voter polarization at home
New parties with old labels
The Spillover of the US Capitol Insurrection
Do Voters Pay Attention to Transnational Politics? Party Positions, Transnational Families, and Voter Perceptions
Autocratization Spillover
Can Authoritarians’ Electoral Success Abroad Change Citizens’ Satisfaction with Democracy
Transnational Populism? Representative Claims, Media and the Difficulty of Constructing a Transnational “People”
Case Study Research
Cultural Backlash
Voting after the Bombings
Three Is a Crowd? Podemos, Ciudadanos, and Vox
The corrosive effect of corruption on trust in politicians
Explaining the end of Spanish exceptionalism and electoral support for Vox
Norm Perception as a Vehicle for Social Change
On far right parties, master frames and trans-national diffusion
The transnationalisation of far right discourse on Twitter
A new hope for europhiles? The 2017 German federal elections and the revenge of the pro-European mainstream
Victims of the Pandemic? European Far-Right Parties and Covid-19
Risk aversion and bandwagon effect in the pivotal voter model
Discrete Events and Hate Crimes
Are Anti-Political-Establishment Parties a Peril for European Democracy? A Longitudinal Study from 1950 till 2017
Do voters want domestic politicians to scrutinize the European Union
When economic and cultural interests align
Terrorist attacks and Europeans’ attitudes towards immigrants
At odds with Europe
A Trump Effect on the EU’s Popularity? The U.S. Presidential Election as a Natural Experiment
Explaining the emergence of the radical right in Spain and Portugal
Two-bloc Logic, Polarisation and Coalition Government
Dallas and Warsaw
Think Twice before Jumping on the Bandwagon
Does accommodation work? Mainstream party strategies and the success of radical right parties
Does Radical-Right Success Make the Political Debate More Negative? Evidence from Emotional Rhetoric in German State Parliaments
Waking Up the Golden Dawn
Unexpected Event during Survey Design
Terror attacks, issue salience, and party competence
Measuring populism worldwide
Follow the foreign leader? Why following foreign incumbents is an effective electoral strategy
Electoral fortunes of social democratic parties
The effect of Covid‐19 lockdowns on political support
Is extreme right‐wing populism contagious? Explaining the emergence of a new party family
Brexit Domino? The Political Contagion Effects of Voter-endorsed Withdrawals from International Institutions
Do Voters Polarize When Radical Parties Enter Parliament
Global Racist Contagion Following Donald Trump's Election
The Causal Effect of Radical Right Success on Mainstream Parties’ Policy Positions
Electoral Spillovers in an Intertwined World
The Trump Effect
Niche Party Success and Mainstream Party Policy Shifts - How Green and Radical Right Parties Differ in Their Impact
Election polling errors across time and space
Party Policy Diffusion
How Parties React to Voter Transitions
The Sociology of the Radical Right
| Unique citing works | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |