Conditional Rights, Benefit Reform, and Drug Users
Reducing Dependency
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11448563 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Neville Harris (0000-0001-5383-2191, University of Manchester, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 233-263 |
| Publication date | 2010-06-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Law and Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0263-323X • E-ISSN: 1467-6478 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1467-6478.2010.00503.x |
| PMID | 20726144 |
| OpenAlex | W2118980034 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
United Kingdom government policy to increase social security claimants' entry to the labour market through conditions attached to unemployed, sickness and incapacity benefits now includes additional measures to activate particular groups such as lone parents and drug users. The latter are a prime target because of their high level of dependency on benefits and because social security rules are seen as having the potential to modify the behaviour of individuals with a lifestyle regarded as being at odds with the moral obligations of citizenship and incompatible with the government's realization of its wider economic and social goals. There are strict procedures for the identification of drug‐user claimants, enabling additional conditions to be attached to their benefit rights. This article discusses the general trend in benefit reform towards increased conditionality and evaluates the reforms affecting drug users, considering human rights and other implications. It concludes by reflecting on the status of conditional rights to social security as social rights
Business · Conditionality · Dependency (UML · Economics · Government (linguistics · Human rights · Odds · Political science · Politics · Public economics · Social rights · Social security · Employment and Welfare Studies · Healthcare innovation and challenges · Law · Medicine · Public Administration · Social Policy and Reform Studies
| Citations per year | 0.29 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2012 - 2022 (11) |
| Highly cited | No |