Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Sentencing, Rationality, and Computer Technology

Bibliographic Data

ID11448705
AuthorsNeil Hutton (corresponding author)
Year1995
Volume22
Issue4
Pages549
Publication date1995-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Law and Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0263-323X • E-ISSN: 1467-6478
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/1410614
OpenAlexW2064979371
LanguageEN
Citations received9
References cited5

A number of jurisdictions have recently begun to employ computer technology to provide support for sentencers. This essay reviews these projects and discusses how the use of computers fits into our understanding of sentencing as a decision-making process. While most work on sentencing has been written from a moral philosophical or legal perspective,' this essay examines sentenc- ing2 from a sociological perspective. In order to address the possible impact of computer technology on sentencing, it is necessary to examine sentencing as a decision-making process carried out by social actors in a social setting. There has been very little research in this area. Important empirical studies3 have tried to explain how social psychological factors influence sentencers' decisions. There is also a tradition which identifies disparity in sentencing4 but this work does not explain how disparity is produced by the social practice of sentencing. This essay seeks to map out some more general concepts which help understand sentencing as a social process

Criminology · Political science · Rationality · Computer Science · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Psychology

  • E-regulation and the rule of law

    Rónán Kennedy, Hans Jochen Scholl•Information Polity•2016

  • Encounters of a different kind

    Open Access•Kristel Beyens, Veerle Scheirs•Punishment & Society•2010

  • From intuition to database

    Open Access•Neil Hutton•Theoretical Criminology•2013

  • Sentencing Theory, Proportionality and Pragmatism

    Open Access•Ralph Henham•International Journal of the…•2000

  • Theory and Contextual Analysis in Sentencing

    Open Access•Ralph Henham•International Journal of the…•2001

  • Problems of Theorizing Sentencing Research

    Open Access•Ralph Henham•International Journal of the…•2000

  • Belgian Sentencing as a Bifurcated Practice

    Veerle Scheirs, Kristel Beyens et al.•Crime and Justice•2016

  • Justicia juvenil, drogas y sentencias judiciales

    Open Access•Paulo Pontes Fraga, Luzania Barreto Rodrigues et al.•Estudios Sociológicos de El…•2020

  • Les juges belges face à l'(in)exécution des peines

    Kristel Beyens, Clémence Françoise et al.•Déviance et Société•2010

  • Doing Justice

    Andrew Von Hirsch•Doing Justice•1985

  • Sentencing and Criminal Justice

    Andrew Ashworth•Sentencing and Criminal Justice…•2005

  • Delinquency and Drift

    David Matza•Delinquency and Drift•2018

  • Punishment and Modern Society

    David Garland•Punishment and Modern Society•1990

  • Law That Does Not Fit Society

    J J Savelsberg•American Journal of Sociology•1992

Unique citing works9
Citations per year0,35
Citation span2000 - 2020 (21)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 9

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae