Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Guilty pleas in children

Legitimacy, vulnerability, and the need for increased protection

Bibliographic Data

ID11449243
AuthorsRebecca K Helm (0000-0003-1429-3847, Law School University of Exeter, Amory Building Rennes Drive Exeter EX4 4RJ England, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume48
Issue2
Pages179-201
Publication date2021-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Law and Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0263-323X • E-ISSN: 1467-6478
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/jols.12289
OpenAlexW3157682335
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited11

This article assesses the extent to which current guilty plea procedure is consistent with legitimations of criminal convictions, with a focus on decision making in child defendants. I argue that in the context of plea decisions in children, the criminal justice system must ensure that defendants make decisions that result in accurate convictions that are reached in a fair way that respects rights. The current system does not do this due to an almost exclusive focus on autonomy. This focus is likely to be leading to illegitimate convictions, most importantly children pleading guilty when innocent. Drawing on psychological theory, I develop a model of guilty plea decision making and draw on this model to identify relevant vulnerabilities of child defendants. Based on this analysis, I identify ways in which current procedure in England and Wales may be leading to systematic problems with the legitimacy of convictions of children, and suggest reforms to enhance such legitimacy. These reform suggestions focus on England and Wales but have implications for plea systems around the world

Autonomy · Context (archaeology · Criminal justice · Criminology · Legitimacy · Plea · Pleading · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Deception detection and forensic psychology · Law · Psychology · Torture, Ethics, and Law

  • The Psychology of Guilty Plea Decisions

    Open Access•Rebecca K Helm•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2024

  • Police-induced confessions

    Saul M Kassin, Steven A Drizin et al.•Law and Human Behavior•2010

  • The crisis in legally aided criminal defence in Wales

    Open Access•Roxanna Dehaghani, Daniel Newman•Legal Studies•2021

  • Police-induced confessions, 2.0

    Open Access•Saul M Kassin, Hayley M D Cleary et al.•Law and Human Behavior•2025

  • How do adolescents see their future? A review of the development of future orientation and planning

    Open Access•Johanna Nurmi•Developmental Review•1991

  • Dual processes in decision making and developmental neuroscience

    Open Access•Valerie F Reyna, Charles J Brainerd•Developmental Review•2011

  • A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking

    Open Access•Laurence Steinberg•Developmental Review•2008

  • Freedom now or a future later

    Vanessa A Edkins, Lucian E Dervan•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2018

  • Reflections of the self

    Open Access•Todd Mcelroy, John J Seta et al.•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2006

  • An Explicit Test of Plea Bargaining in the “Shadow of the Trial”

    Open Access•Shawn D Bushway, Allison D Redlich et al.•Criminology•2014

  • Theorising Children's Rights in Youth Justice

    Open Access•Kathryn Hollingsworth•Modern Law Review•2013

  • Logical but incompetent plea decisions

    Open Access•Rebecca K Helm, Valerie F Reyna•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2017

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,5
Citation span2024 - 2024 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae