Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

From contestation to conviction

Terrorism expertise before the courts

Bibliographic Data

ID11449359
AuthorsTasniem Anwar (0000-0002-6110-9144, Department of Political Science University of Amsterdam Nieuwe Achtergracht 166, 1018 WV Amsterdam the Netherlands, corresponding author), Marieke De Goede (0000-0001-5726-1795, Department of Political Science University of Amsterdam Nieuwe Achtergracht 166, 1018 WV Amsterdam the Netherlands, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume48
Issue2
Pages137-157
Publication date2021-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Law and Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0263-323X • E-ISSN: 1467-6478
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/jols.12294
OpenAlexW3163028645
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited6

This article asks how terrorism expertise has been mobilized in recent trials on terrorism financing. How is expert knowledge concerning ongoing and complex political situations involving alleged terrorism translated into factual evidence before a court of law? What kind of sources do courts use in terrorism cases, and what kind of expert knowledge is acknowledged or ignored? Through analysis of concrete cases under the United Kingdom (UK) Terrorism Act (2000) and the Dutch penal law Article 421Sr, we show how contested terrorism expertise becomes ‘certified knowledge’ that holds together as grounds for conviction before a court of law. This article contributes to socio‐legal debates on legal knowledge in two ways. First, we analyse the everyday, material practices of gathering, presenting, and contesting expertise in relation to security. Second, the article analyses new case material and a particular kind of knowledge – namely, security knowledge and terrorism expertise – to identify patterns in what is deemed relevant for the court

Conviction · Criminology · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Terrorism · Criminal Law and Evidence · International Law and Human Rights · Law · Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence

  • Opaque trials

    Open Access•Kodili Henry Chukwuma•Third World Quarterly•2026

  • Traditional Healing and Law in Contemporary Senegal

    Open Access•Emilie Cloatre, Tidiane Ndoye et al.•Social & Legal Studies•2022

  • The Courtroom as Four Landscapes

    Open Access•Tasniem Anwar, Machteld Aardse•Social & Legal Studies•2024

  • White terrorism on trial

    Sophie Marois•Ethnic and Racial Studies•2026

  • An 'unfathomable hatred of Islam

    Open Access•Fabrice Fernandez, Sophie Maroi et al.•The Sociological Review•2024

  • Science, truth, and forensic cultures

    Open Access•Michael Lynch, Michael S Lynch•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2013

  • Judges’ socio-technical review of contested expertise

    Open Access•Jaakko Taipale•Social Studies of Science•2019

  • The Regulation of Nicotine in the United Kingdom

    Open Access•Catriona Rooke, Emilie Cloatre et al.•Journal of Law and Society•2012

  • Pre-Crime and Counter-Terrorism

    Jock Mcculloch, Sharon Pickering•The British Journal of Criminology•2009

  • The politics of security lists

    Open Access•Marieke De Goede, Gavin B Sullivan et al.•Environment and Planning D…•2016

  • Future Emergencies

    Open Access•Sven Opitz, Ute Tellmann•Theory Culture & Society•2015

Unique citing works5
Citations per year1,25
Citation span2022 - 2026 (5)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae