Implementation in International Business Self‐regulation
The Importance of Sequences and their Linkages
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11449591 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Tony Porter (0000-0001-9798-1885, Department of Political Science McMaster University 1280 Main Street West Hamilton Ontario L8S4L8 Canada, corresponding author), Karsten Ronit (0000-0003-1485-6937, Department of Political Science University of Copenhagen 5 Øster Farimagsgade 1353 Copenhagen DK Denmark, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2015 |
| Volume | 42 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 413-433 |
| Publication date | 2015-09-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Law and Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0263-323X • E-ISSN: 1467-6478 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1467-6478.2015.00717.x |
| OpenAlex | W1543664716 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
Self‐regulation by business is increasingly common internationally, but the effective implementation of international rules often continues to be seen as something that only states can carry out. We argue that more exclusively private forms of effective implementation can be constructed in self‐regulation. Drawing on research in private international law, public policy implementation and self‐regulation, we identify four distinct implementation sequences: monitoring, compliance, adjudication, and sanctioning. These sequences are sometimes constituted in response to deliberate integrated plans, but also come together in a decentralized manner. Many international business actors devise ways to carry out the sequences in order to implement rules that are important for them, reflecting a functional logic of implementation that is creative and pragmatic, and together constitute an important stage in the policy process of self‐regulation
Business · Industrial organization · International Business and FDI
| Citations per year | 0.25 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2018 - 2022 (5) |
| Highly cited | No |