Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Nanotechnology and the Products of Inherited Regulation

Bibliographic Data

ID11449654
AuthorsElen Stokes (University of Wales, corresponding author)
Year2012
Volume39
Issue1
Pages93-112
Publication date2012-03-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Law and Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0263-323X • E-ISSN: 1467-6478
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1467-6478.2012.00572.x
OpenAlexW2047788690
LanguageEN
Citations received14

New technologies do not always elicit new regulatory responses. More often than not, policymakers deal with new technologies by deferring to existing regulatory regimes. This article argues that there are often overlooked consequences of grafting a new technological area, displaying different types of risks and uncertainties, onto an existing regulatory framework. Not only can it entail the application of ill‐suited rules and standards, but it can also involve the reproduction of deeply ingrained traditions and assumptions which, under the weight of history, makes scrutiny extremely difficult. As is shown here, nanotechnology‐enhanced products inherit a raft of consumer protection rules as well as a regulatory predisposition to internal market facilitation. So entrenched is the focus on market opening that making ad hoc changes to existing regulations to incorporate the broader concerns around nano‐products cannot escape the reach of a very powerful market context

Biology · Business · Context (archaeology · Emerging technologies · Industrial organization · Nanotechnology · Political science · Risk analysis (engineering · Scrutiny · Corporate Law and Human Rights · International Environmental Law and Policies · Law · World Trade Organization Law

  • New Technologies and the Law in War and Peace

    William H Boothby•New Technologies and the Law in…•2018

  • Nanotechnology and Risk Governance in the European Union

    Open Access•H Rodríguez•NanoEthics•2017

  • Regulating Emerging and Future Technologies in the Present

    Open Access•Karinne Ludlow, Diana M Bowman et al.•NanoEthics•2015

  • The politics of valuation and payment for regenerative medicine products in the UK

    Open Access•Alex Faulkner, Aurélie Mahalatchimy•New Genetics and Society•2018

  • The Abortion Act (1967)

    Open Access•Sally Sheldon, Gayle Davis et al.•Legal Studies•2018

  • Stretching and Challenging the Boundaries of Law

    Open Access•Alex Faulkner, Lonneke Poort•Minerva•2017

  • Steering biomedicine

    Alex Faulkner•Innovation The European Journal…•2012

  • Cosmopolitics of a Regulatory Fit

    Petrus Kautto, Helena Valve•Science as Culture•2018

  • Special Treatment? Flexibilities in the Politics of Regenerative Medicine’s Gatekeeping Regimes in the UK

    Alex Faulkner•Science as Culture•2017

  • It’s (Not) Just Semantics

    Open Access•Walter G Johnson•Law & Social Inquiry•2025

  • L’éclipse

    Marie Andrée Jacob, Marie-Andree Jacob•Canadian Journal of Women and the…•2013

  • Mind the gap

    Open Access•Dinar Kale•Technology in Society•2019

  • Legal Repair

    Open Access•Sebastian Billow, Marc-Olivier Déplaude•Science Technology & Human Values•2026

  • Caught in quicksand? Compliance and legitimacy challenges in using regulatory sandboxes to manage emerging technologies

    Open Access•Walter G Johnson•Regulation & Governance•2023

Citations per year1
Citation span2012 - 2026 (15)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae