Saakashvili in the public eye
What public opinion polls tell us
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11450982 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nana Sumbadze (0000-0002-4279-8781, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2009 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 185-197 |
| Publication date | 2009-06-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Central Asian Survey (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0263-4937 • E-ISSN: 1465-3354 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/02634930903043725 |
| OpenAlex | W2032668624 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 2 |
Change of power through elections remains an unattainable goal of Georgian democracy. To a great extent, presidential power depends on public support. How does the public view Saakashvili? What changes occurred during his rule? To what extent has he fulfilled his promises? What are the views of the supporters of different political actors? This analysis uses surveys carried out by the Institute of Policy Studies prior to and after Saakashvili's elections. It reveals certain achievements in state building and the crystallization of a positive orientation towards the West. But many hopes have turned into disappointments. Disrespect for individual rights, inequality before the law, fear of a renewed war, poverty and the loss of homes are realities. Democracy has not been built. Disillusionment and the existence of the two realities, one seen by Saakashvili supporters and another by all others, is obvious. Integration of these two visions must be the goal of the government
Democracy · Government (linguistics · Law and economics · Neutrality · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Presidential system · Public opinion · Sociology · State (computer science · Vision · Global Socioeconomic and Political Dynamics · Law · Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics · Public Administration · Russia and Soviet political economy
| Citations per year | 0.31 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2010 - 2017 (8) |
| Highly cited | No |