The formative stages of Beowulf textual scholarship
Part I
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11451966 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Birte Kelly (University of Hertfordshire, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1982 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Pages | 247-274 |
| Publication date | 1982-12-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Anglo-Saxon England (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0263-6751 • E-ISSN: 1474-0532 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0263675100002623 |
| OpenAlex | W2088303779 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 1 |
Probably it is generally recognized that present-day apprehension of the text of Beowulf owes a great deal to scholars of the first half of the nineteenth century, for most editions carry numerous textual notes attributing readings to authorities such as Grundtvig, Kemble, Thorpe and Grein. But often realization of the debt remains only vague. Much of the achievement of the first editors is, in fact, difficult to define, because it consisted in a gradual development of editorial standards and practices through the solution of many individual problems of word and line division, the establishment of numerous particular sentence structures and the identification of a number of proper names. The readings which editors have felt obliged to supply in order to restore those lost because of damage to the manuscript or to repair scribal errors or omissions can, however, be identified and quantified, and analysis shows that well over half of all such readings adopted by editors from 1950 onwards had been proposed by 1857. It is therefore the nature and significance of the readings supplied by that date which this article aims at demonstrating
Aesthetics · Apprehension · Art · Debt · Epistemology · Formative assessment · Identification (biology · Linguistics · Literature · Mathematics education · Order (exchange · Period (music · Political science · Realization (probability · Scholarship · Sentence · Computer Science · History · Law · Medieval Literature and History · Philosophy · Psychology
| Citations per year | 0.21 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2002 - 2018 (17) |
| Highly cited | No |