Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Trends in private land conservation

Increasing complexity, shifting conservation purposes and allowable private land uses

Bibliographic Data

ID11463189
AuthorsJessica Owley (0000-0001-5053-0753, University of Miami, corresponding author), Adena R Rissman (0000-0001-8566-3708, University of Wisconsin–Madison)
Year2016
Volume51
Pages76-84
Publication date2016-02-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLand Use Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0264-8377 • E-ISSN: 1873-5754
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.10.026
OpenAlexW2179707546
LanguageEN
Citations received20
References cited16

The terrain of private-land conservation dealmaking is shifting. As the number of acres of private land protected for conservation increases, our understanding of what it means for a property to be "conserved" is shifting. We examined 269 conservation easements and conducted 73 interviews with land conservation organizations to investigate changes in private-land conservation in the United States. We hypothesized that since 2000, conservation easements have become more complex but less restrictive. Our analysis reveals shifts in what it means for private land to be "conserved." We found that conservation easements have indeed become more complex, with more purposes and terms after 2000 compared to conservation easements recorded before 2000. However, changes in restrictiveness of conservation easements varied by land use. Mining and waste dumping were less likely to be allowed after 2000, but new residences and structures were twice as likely to be allowed. We found a shift toward allowing some bounded timber harvest and grazing, and a decline in terms that entirely allow or prohibit these working land uses. Interviews revealed staff perceptions of reasons for these changes. Our analysis suggests that "used" landscapes are increasingly important for conservation but that conserving these properties stretches the limits of simple, perpetual policy tools and requires increasingly complex and contingent agreements

Business · Easement · Economics · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Land use · Natural resource economics · Political science · Private property · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Forest Management and Policy · Ecology

  • Do working forest easements work for conservation

    Open Access•Jonathan R Thompson, Alexey Kalinin et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2024

  • Strike While the Iron is Hot

    Open Access•Samantha Zuhlke, Juniper Katz et al.•Nonprofit Policy Forum•2024

  • Conserving what? Conservation easements and environmental justice in the coastal US South

    Open Access•Levi Van Sant, Dean Hardy et al.•Human Geography•2020

  • Buying forests for conservation

    Open Access•Christoph Nolte•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2018

  • Do conservation covenants consider the delivery of ecosystem services

    Open Access•Carla L Archibald, Marie C Dade et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2020

  • Forest landowner harvest decisions in a new era of conservation stewardship and changing markets in Maine, USA

    Open Access•Jianheng Zhao, Adam Daigneault et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2020

  • Land Trusts as Conservation Boundary Organizations in Rapidly Exurbanizing Landscapes

    Katherine Brownson, Jessica Chappell et al.•Society & Natural Resources•2020

  • Farmland Owners’ Satisfaction with Agricultural Conservation Easements

    Brian J Schilling, Kevin P Sullivan et al.•Society & Natural Resources•2019

  • Changes in Wisconsin’s Large Private Forests, 1999–2015

    Andrew W L’Roe, Adena R Rissman•Society & Natural Resources•2016

  • Spatial Analysis of the Attributes of Working Forest Conservation Easements in the State of Georgia

    Sabhyata Lamichhane, Tyler Reeves et al.•Society & Natural Resources•2023

  • Perceptions of Missouri Landowners With Land Trust Conservation Easements

    Sarah Brown, Sarah A Brown et al.•Society & Natural Resources•2023

  • Adapting conservation easement to Chinese conservation context

    Open Access•Siyuan He, Yu Wei•Forest Policy and Economics•2025

  • Can conservation covenants help sustain nature and livelihoods? Factors associated with conservation covenant adopters in Australia

    Open Access•Carla L Archibald, Kelly S Fielding et al.•People and Nature•2025

  • Sustaining land and people over time

    Open Access•Adena R Rissman, Alex Kazer et al.•People and Nature•2023

  • Collaborative Interaction as a Pathway to Realized Publicness

    Open Access•C Smith, Craig R Smith•Administration & Society•2026

  • Enhancing natural habitats conservation success on private lands by understanding and addressing deficiencies in social capital

    Open Access•Louis Tanguay, Jean-François Bissonnette et al.•Land Use Policy•2025

  • Co-opting and resisting market based instruments for private land conservation

    Open Access•Benjamin Cooke, Gabriella Corbo-Perkins•Land Use Policy•2018

  • Mapping urban ecosystem services to design cost-effective purchase of development rights programs

    Open Access•Charles Claron, Mehdi Mikou et al.•Land Use Policy•2022

  • Acres for the Affluent

    Open Access•Samantha Zuhlke•Journal of Public Administration…•2022

  • Benefits and barriers of public transparency in Rural Environmental Registry data

    Open Access•Stella Verdasca, Victor Eduardo Lima Ranieri•Ambiente & sociedade•2021

  • Land Trusts and Conservation Easements

    Open Access•Adina M Merenlender, Lynn Huntsinger et al.•Conservation Biology•2004

  • Opinions and Social Pressure

    Solomon E Asch•Scientific American•1955

  • Innovation in the States

    Open Access•Virginia Gray•American Political Science Review•1973

Unique citing works20
Citations per year2
Citation span2016 - 2026 (11)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 20

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae