Trends in private land conservation
Increasing complexity, shifting conservation purposes and allowable private land uses
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11463189 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jessica Owley (0000-0001-5053-0753, University of Miami, corresponding author), Adena R Rissman (0000-0001-8566-3708, University of Wisconsin–Madison) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 51 |
| Pages | 76-84 |
| Publication date | 2016-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Land Use Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0264-8377 • E-ISSN: 1873-5754 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.10.026 |
| OpenAlex | W2179707546 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 20 |
| References cited | 16 |
The terrain of private-land conservation dealmaking is shifting. As the number of acres of private land protected for conservation increases, our understanding of what it means for a property to be "conserved" is shifting. We examined 269 conservation easements and conducted 73 interviews with land conservation organizations to investigate changes in private-land conservation in the United States. We hypothesized that since 2000, conservation easements have become more complex but less restrictive. Our analysis reveals shifts in what it means for private land to be "conserved." We found that conservation easements have indeed become more complex, with more purposes and terms after 2000 compared to conservation easements recorded before 2000. However, changes in restrictiveness of conservation easements varied by land use. Mining and waste dumping were less likely to be allowed after 2000, but new residences and structures were twice as likely to be allowed. We found a shift toward allowing some bounded timber harvest and grazing, and a decline in terms that entirely allow or prohibit these working land uses. Interviews revealed staff perceptions of reasons for these changes. Our analysis suggests that "used" landscapes are increasingly important for conservation but that conserving these properties stretches the limits of simple, perpetual policy tools and requires increasingly complex and contingent agreements
Business · Easement · Economics · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Land use · Natural resource economics · Political science · Private property · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Forest Management and Policy · Ecology
Do working forest easements work for conservation
Strike While the Iron is Hot
Conserving what? Conservation easements and environmental justice in the coastal US South
Buying forests for conservation
Do conservation covenants consider the delivery of ecosystem services
Forest landowner harvest decisions in a new era of conservation stewardship and changing markets in Maine, USA
Land Trusts as Conservation Boundary Organizations in Rapidly Exurbanizing Landscapes
Farmland Owners’ Satisfaction with Agricultural Conservation Easements
Changes in Wisconsin’s Large Private Forests, 1999–2015
Spatial Analysis of the Attributes of Working Forest Conservation Easements in the State of Georgia
Perceptions of Missouri Landowners With Land Trust Conservation Easements
Adapting conservation easement to Chinese conservation context
Can conservation covenants help sustain nature and livelihoods? Factors associated with conservation covenant adopters in Australia
Sustaining land and people over time
Collaborative Interaction as a Pathway to Realized Publicness
Enhancing natural habitats conservation success on private lands by understanding and addressing deficiencies in social capital
Co-opting and resisting market based instruments for private land conservation
Mapping urban ecosystem services to design cost-effective purchase of development rights programs
Acres for the Affluent
Benefits and barriers of public transparency in Rural Environmental Registry data
| Unique citing works | 20 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2016 - 2026 (11) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 20 |