Public preferences for biodiversity conservation and climate-change mitigation
A choice experiment using ecosystem services indicators
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11463553 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kikuko Shoyama (0000-0003-2444-3378, National Institute for Environmental Studies, corresponding author), Shunsuke Managi (0000-0001-7883-1427, Tohoku University), Yoshiki Yamagata (0000-0001-5111-8912, National Institute for Environmental Studies) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 34 |
| Pages | 282-293 |
| Publication date | 2013-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Land Use Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0264-8377 • E-ISSN: 1873-5754 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.04.003 |
| OpenAlex | W1594334351 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 22 |
| References cited | 21 |
Biodiversity · Business · Climate change · Climate change mitigation · Economics · Ecosystem · Ecosystem services · Endangered species · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Land use · Natural resource economics · Preference · Public good · Willingness to pay · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Environmental Conservation and Management · Environmental Science · Land Use and Ecosystem Services · Ecology
Estimating the Economic Values of Restricted Monoculture Eucalyptus Plantations
Establishment and Application of an Evaluation Model for Orchid Island Sustainable Tourism Development
The Construction and Validation of a Sustainable Tourism Development Evaluation Model
Using network of species interactions to value biodiversity conservation in a megadiverse country
People are willing to pay for climate- and biodiversity-friendly policies in Finland
Pro-social versus pro-self motivations for green roof adoption
Using a choice experiment approach to assess production tradeoffs for developing the croton value chain in Kenya
Small-scale private forest ownership
The hidden dimension of low-carbon public transport policies
Disentangling ecosystem services preferences and values
Where and why is landscape considered valuable? Societal actors’ perceptions of ecosystem services across Bavaria (Germany)
Rancher viewpoint diversity in human–wildlife coexistence management
Identifying Legal Priorities for Policy Making
Mechanisms behind concurrent payments for ecosystem services in a Chinese nature reserve
What is a lion worth to local people – Quantifying of the costs of living alongside a top predator
Unraveling local preferences and willingness to pay for different management scenarios
Examining demand for urban river rehabilitation in Indonesia
Integrating Aspects of Ecosystem Dimensions into Sorghum and Wheat Production Areas in Kinmen, Taiwan
Public preference for sustainable land use policies – Empirical results from multinomial logit model analysis
Multi-dimensional eco-land classification and management for implementing the ecological redline policy in China
The impact of flood dynamics on property values
Rural residents’ preferences for low-carbon housing in Hainan, China
Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes
Global Biodiversity
Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services
Aggregating the benefits of environmental improvements
Confronting unfamiliarity with ecosystem functions
Benefits and limitations of the ecosystem services concept in environmental policy and decision making
The aggregation of environmental benefit values
Choice experiment, multiple programmes contingent valuation and landscape preferences
Do attitudes toward ecosystem services determine agricultural land use practices? An analysis of farmers’ decision-making in a South Korean watershed
Encouraging collaboration for the provision of ecosystem services at a landscape scale—Rethinking agri-environmental payments
Trade-offs across Space, Time, and Ecosystem Services
| Unique citing works | 22 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,2 |
| Citation span | 2016 - 2026 (11) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 22 |