Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Designing an incentive system to promote the adoption of sustainable soil health management practices among smallholder farmers in northern Ghana

Bibliographic Data

ID11464321
AuthorsSolomon Amoabeng-Nimako (0000-0001-6907-249X, Université Mohammed VI Polytechnique, corresponding author), P T M Ingenbleek (0000-0001-8793-716X, Wageningen University & Research), Saa Dittoh (0000-0001-9048-7809, University for Development Studies), Amadou Gouzaye (0000-0003-1867-1438, OCP Group (Morocco)), Prem Bindraban, P S Bindraban (0000-0001-5221-8763, Africa Rice Center)
Year2026
Volume161
Pages107847
Publication date2026-02-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLand Use Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0264-8377 • E-ISSN: 1873-5754
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107847
OpenAlexW4416280522
LanguageEN
References cited90

Declining soil health threatens smallholder agriculture in sub-Saharan Africa, undermining food security and the sustainability of agri-food systems. Although sustainable soil health management (SSHM) offers proven solutions, its adoption remains limited due to systemic barriers constraining farmers’ ability to access, combine, and benefit from essential resources. While recent scholarship calls for holistic, systems-based incentives, empirical research that designs such incentive systems remains scarce. This study addresses this gap by designing a farmer-centric SSHM incentive system tailored to the institutional realities of smallholders. Grounded in farmers’ expressed preferences, the study translates largely conceptual recommendations into concrete system designs. Drawing on an exploratory study, five dimensions of smallholder market systems were translated as attributes of an incentive system. A rating-based conjoint experiment with 744 maize and soybean farmers in northern Ghana assessed preferences across these attributes. The findings reveal four insights: 1)Farmers prefer bundled arrangements, such as integrating sustainability support with input credit and linking them to buyer contracts. 2)They follow a clear preference hierarchy, prioritizing incentives that reduce adoption barriers before those that stimulate motivation or enhance skills. 3)Two distinct farmer segments emerge, one oriented toward market access and the other toward production support, reflecting different adoption priority logics. 4)Farmers support system-based incentives that are anchored in private sector-led coordination. These findings point to clear policy directions. Governments should create enabling conditions for bundled service creation and delivery, agribusinesses and financial institutions should expand input-output-linked services to incorporate sustainability packages, and multi-stakeholder solutions should be organized around private coordination under regulatory oversight. • A farmer-centric incentive system for sustainable soil health is developed in northern Ghana. • Conjoint analysis with 744 farmers captures preferences for incentive system attributes. • Farmers show a clear preference hierarchy, prioritizing barrier-reducing incentives over motivational ones. • Two distinct farmer segments emerge with different preference logics: market-oriented and production-oriented. • Private-sector coordination is preferred as the anchor for system-based incentives

Agriculture · Conceptual framework · Empirical research · Food security · Incentive · Private sector · Scholarship · Sustainability · Sustainable agriculture · Agricultural Innovations and Practices · Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Agriculture · Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis

  • Conjoint Analysis in Marketing

    Open Access•Paul E Green, V Srinivasan•Journal of Marketing•1990

  • Overcoming Market Constraints on Pro‐Poor Agricultural Growth in Sub‐Saharan Africa

    Open Access•Colin Poulton, Jonathan Kydd et al.•Development Policy Review•2006

  • A scoping review on incentives for adoption of sustainable agricultural practices and their outcomes

    Open Access•Valeria Piñeiro, Joaquín Arias et al.•Nature Sustainability•2020

  • Input subsidy programs in sub‐Saharan Africa

    Open Access•T S Jayne, Shahidur Rashid•Agricultural Economics•2013

  • Rethinking technological change in smallholder agriculture

    Open Access•Dominic Glover, James Sumberg et al.•Outlook on Agriculture•2019

  • Understanding of consumer behaviour as a prerequisite for environmental protection

    Open Access•Folke Olander, John Thøgersen•Journal of Consumer Policy•1995

  • Adoption of Multiple Sustainable Agricultural Practices in Rural Ethiopia

    Open Access•Hailemariam Teklewold, Menale Kassie et al.•Journal of Agricultural Economics•2013

  • Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture

    Open Access•D Tilman, Christian Balzer et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2011

  • How a century of ammonia synthesis changed the world

    Open Access•J W Erisman, Matthew Avery Sutton et al.•Nature Geoscience•2008

  • Can sub-Saharan Africa feed itself?

    Open Access•Martin K Van Ittersum, L G J van Bussel et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2016

  • When yield gaps are poverty traps

    Open Access•Pablo Tittonell, Ken E Giller•Field Crops Research•2013

  • Conservation agriculture and smallholder farming in Africa

    Open Access•Ken E Giller, Ernst Witter et al.•Field Crops Research•2009

  • The behaviour change wheel

    Open Access•Susan Michie, Maartje M Van Stralen et al.•Implementation Science•2011

  • Mobile-based advisory services for sustainable agriculture

    Open Access•Hazem S Kassem, Bader Alhafi Alotaibi et al.•Information Development•2021

  • A global analysis of land take in cropland areas and production displacement from urbanization

    Open Access•Jasper van Vliet, David A Eitelberg et al.•Global Environmental Change•2017

  • Perceptions of Climate Variability and Soil Fertility Management Choices Among Smallholder Farmers in Northern Ghana

    Open Access•Emmanuel Martey, John K M Kuwornu et al.•Ecological Economics•2020

  • From market-based development to value chain transformation

    Open Access•R Ruben•Journal of Rural Studies•2024

  • Soil management in relation to sustainable agriculture and ecosystem services

    Open Access•D S Powlson, Peter Gregory et al.•Food Policy•2011

  • Formal institutions and social capital in value chains

    Open Access•G W Meijerink, Gerdien Meijerink et al.•Food Policy•2014

  • Value chain innovations for technology transfer in developing and emerging economies

    Open Access•Johan Swinnen, Rob Kuijpers•Food Policy•2017

  • Agricultural intensification

    Open Access•Mark R Rosenzweig, Hans P Binswanger-Mkhize et al.•Food Policy•2016

  • Impact of Information and Communication Technology-Based Market Information Services on Smallholder Farm Input Use and Productivity

    Open Access•Sylvester Ogutu, Sylvester Ochieng Ogutu et al.•World Development•2014

  • Adoption of sustainable land and water management practices and their impact on crop productivity among smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa

    Open Access•Cool Dady Mangole, Charles Mbogo Maina et al.•Land Use Policy•2025

  • Determinants of mechanized technology adoption in smallholder agriculture

    Open Access•Khaleel Mohammed, Kamaldeen Mohammed et al.•Land Use Policy•2023

  • Adoption of interrelated sustainable agricultural practices among smallholder farmers in Ghana

    Open Access•Dennis Sedem Ehiakpor, Gideon Danso-Abbeam et al.•Land Use Policy•2021

  • The art and science of innovation systems inquiry

    Open Access•David J Spielman, Javier M Ekboir et al.•Technology in Society•2009

  • Actor roles and linkages in the agricultural innovation system

    Open Access•Justina Adwoa Onumah, Felix Asante et al.•Innovation and Development•2021

  • Affordances and agricultural technology

    Open Access•Dominic Glover•Journal of Rural Studies•2022

  • Rethinking Global Food Demand for 2050

    Open Access•Walter P Falcon, Rosamond L Naylor et al.•Population and Development Review•2022

  • Small farms, smaller plots

    Mark Paul, Mwangi Wa Gĩthĩnji•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2018

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae