Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Playing by the rules? Analysing incremental urban developments

Bibliographic Data

ID11467916
AuthorsLilian van Karnenbeek (Wageningen University & Research, corresponding author), Leonie Janssen-Jansen (Wageningen University & Research)
Year2018
Volume72
Pages402-409
Publication date2018-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLand Use Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0264-8377 • E-ISSN: 1873-5754
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.12.021
OpenAlexW2783229216
LanguageEN
Citations received24
References cited39

Current urban developments are often considered outdated and static, and the argument follows that they should become more adaptive. In this paper, we argue that existing urban development are already adaptive and incremental. Given this flexibility in urban development, understanding changes in the so-called ‘rules of the game’ which structure and change collective action, is increasingly relevant. Gaining such insights advances the ability of planners to deal with perceived spatial problems. The aim of this paper is twofold. First, to develop an analytical framework for scrutinizing changes in rules in incremental urban developments and second, to test the analytical framework in a real-life incremental urban development. Building on Ostrom’s IAD Framework we develop an analytical framework that makes a distinction between formal and informal rules, connects sets of rules, actors and interaction patterns and provides a comparative, longitudinal perspective. The case of the Navy Yard in Amsterdam, the Netherlands is used in order to test the framework’s application, proving the relevance of investigating how rules in urban development change

Action (physics · Argument (complex analysis · Civil engineering · Development (topology · Economics · Flexibility (engineering · Management · Management science · Operations research · Political science · Relevance (law · Urban planning · Computer Science · Engineering · Housing Market and Economics · Land Use and Ecosystem Services · Law · Mathematics · Urban Planning and Governance

  • Integrating High-speed Railway Stations and Urban Areas in China

    Open Access•Biyue Wang•Architecture and the Built…•2022

  • Developing places for human capabilities

    Open Access•Céline Janssen•Architecture and the Built…•2024

  • Coping with collective interests in a self-organised planning regime

    Andrea Testi•International Planning Studies•2022

  • How rule directions influence actors to achieve collective action

    Open Access•Robin Neef, Tim Busscher et al.•European Planning Studies•2023

  • Wastewater management by citizens

    Open Access•Lilian van Karnenbeek, Willem Salet et al.•Journal of Environmental Planning…•2021

  • Rules for the Governance of Transport and Land use Integration in High-speed Railway Station Areas in China

    Open Access•Biyue Wang, Aksel Ersoy et al.•Urban Policy and Research•2022

  • Greening the city between public needs and private preferences in Carré de Soie, Lyon

    Lilian van Karnenbeek•Town Planning Review•2021

  • Exploring the relationship between ‘sites and services’ projects and urban adaptability. A case study of Charkop (Mumbai)

    Open Access•Andrea Testi•Habitat International•2023

  • Understanding people-centered planning practice in Europe

    Open Access•Céline Janssen•Planning Practice and Research•2024

  • Conceptualising Co-creative Planning Pedagogies

    Open Access•Lilian van Karnenbeek, Leonie Janssen-Jansen et al.•Planning Practice and Research•2022

  • Mapping institutional change

    Open Access•Robin Neef, Tim Busscher et al.•European Policy Analysis•2022

  • Uncomfortable knowledge

    Open Access•Hallie Eakin, Svenja Keele et al.•World Development•2022

  • The value of self-build

    Open Access•Daniël Bossuyt•Housing Studies•2021

  • The multivalent nexus of redevelopment and heritage conservation

    Open Access•Yongcheng Wang, Keita Yamaguchi et al.•Land Use Policy•2020

  • Institutional analysis and informal urban settlements

    Open Access•Ephraim Kabunda Munshifwa•Land Use Policy•2023

  • Commissioning as the cornerstone of self-build. Assessing the constraints and opportunities of self-build housing in the Netherlands

    Open Access•Daniël Bossuyt, Willem Salet et al.•Land Use Policy•2018

  • Good residents, bad residents

    Open Access•E W Stapper, J W Duyvendak•Cities•2020

  • Neighborhood scale emerging from the clustering of residential redevelopment applications in the historic district of Macao

    Open Access•Yongcheng Wang, Keita Yamaguchi•Cities•2024

  • Shopping centres in decline

    Open Access•Pedro Porfírio Coutinho Guimarães•Cities•2019

  • A typology of social entrepreneurs in bottom-up urban development

    Open Access•Jeroen Mens, Ellen Van Bueren et al.•Cities•2021

  • Unraveling the self-made city

    Open Access•Josje Anna Bouwmeester, Josje Bouwmeester et al.•Cities•2021

  • Dynamics of development of the largest cities - Evidence from Poland

    Open Access•Cezary Kowalczyk, Jacek Kil et al.•Cities•2019

  • Iterative actor-network analysis in incremental urban development

    Open Access•Kunpeng Zhou, Kai Zhou et al.•Habitat International•2026

  • The informal governance of Lego urbanism

    Open Access•Daniël Bossuyt, Abigail Friendly et al.•Urban Studies•2026

  • Practicing Strategic Planning

    Louis Albrechts, Alessandro Balducci•disP - The Planning Review•2013

  • Do institutions for collective action evolve?

    Open Access•Elinor Ostrom, Элинор Остром•Journal of Bioeconomics•2014

  • Consensus Building and Complex Adaptive Systems

    Judith E Innes, David E Booher•Journal of the American Planning…•1999

  • Planning In the Face of Conflict

    John Forester•Journal of the American Planning…•1987

  • Taking path dependence seriously

    Annemette Sorensen, André Sorensen•Planning Perspectives•2015

  • Crafting analytical tools to study institutional change

    Open Access•Elinor Ostrom, Элинор Остром et al.•Journal of Institutional Economics•2011

  • Adaptive planning

    Open Access•Ward Rauws, Gert De Roo•Environment and Planning B…•2016

  • Advocacy and Pluralism in Planning

    Paul Davidoff•Journal of the American Institute…•1965

  • Case Study Research

    Harris Chaiklin•The Journal of Nervous and Mental…•1991

  • Beyond Markets and States

    Elinor Ostrom•American Economic Review•2010

  • Governing the Commons

    Open Access•Elinor Ostrom, Элинор Остром•Governing the Commons•2015

  • Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance

    Open Access•Douglass C North•Institutions, Institutional…•1990

  • Networks of Adjacent Action Situations in Polycentric Governance

    Open Access•Michael D Mcginnis•Policy Studies Journal•2011

  • Games Real Actors Play

    Fritz W Scharpf•Games Real Actors Play•2018

  • Understanding Institutional Diversity

    Elinor Ostrom, Элинор Остром•UNDERSTANDING INSTITUTIONAL…•2006

  • Key Projects for Urban Regeneration

    Dick Schuiling•Planning Practice and Research•1996

  • When Self-Organization Intersects with Urban Planning

    Liisa Horelli, Joanna Saad-Sulonen et al.•Planning Practice and Research•2015

  • Dilemmas of planning

    Open Access•Federico Savini, Stan Majoor et al.•Planning Theory•2014

  • Planning of undefined becoming

    Open Access•Luuk Boelens, Gert De Roo•Planning Theory•2014

  • An evolutionary theory of institutions and a dynamic approach to reform

    Open Access•Stefano Moroni•Planning Theory•2010

  • Institutional Transformation and Planning

    Open Access•Ernest R Alexander•Planning Theory•2005

  • Lindblom’s lament

    Open Access•Michael Atkinson, Michael M Atkinson•Policy and Society•2011

  • Planning Theory's Emerging Paradigm

    Open Access•Judith E Innes•Journal of Planning Education and…•1995

  • Evolving Institutions

    Open Access•Willem Salet, Willem G M Salet•Journal of Planning Education and…•2002

  • The adaptive efficiency of land use planning measured by the control of urban sprawl. The cases of the Netherlands, Belgium and Poland

    Open Access•Jean-Marie Halleux, Szymon Marcińczak et al.•Land Use Policy•2012

  • Water safety and spatial development

    Open Access•Martijn van den Hurk, Ellen Mastenbroek et al.•Land Use Policy•2014

  • Formal/Informal Dialectics and the Self-Transformation of Spatial Planning Systems

    Open Access•Kristof Van Assche, Raoul Beunen et al.•Administration & Society•2014

  • "The Science of "Muddling Through

    Charles E Lindblom•Public Administration Review•1959

  • Collaborative Planning in Perspective

    Open Access•Patsy Healey•Planning Theory•2003

  • Dilemmas in a general theory of planning

    Open Access•Horst W J Rittel, Melvin M Webber•Policy Sciences•1973

  • Self-organization in urban development

    Beitske Boonstra, Luuk Boelens•Urban Research & Practice•2011

  • A Theory of Institutional Change

    Open Access•Edwin Buitelaar, A Lagendijk et al.•Environment and Planning A…•2007

  • Self-Organization and Urban Development

    Open Access•Federico Savini•International Journal of Urban…•2016

Unique citing works24
Citations per year3
Citation span2018 - 2026 (9)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 22

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae